Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 5:53:101265.
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101265. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Paramedic analgesia comparing ketamine and morphine in trauma (PACKMaN): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Affiliations

Paramedic analgesia comparing ketamine and morphine in trauma (PACKMaN): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Michael A Smyth et al. Lancet Reg Health Eur. .

Abstract

Background: Paramedics frequently administer analgesic medications for pain following trauma. Morphine is the most commonly administered strong analgesic. However, it may not be the best option as it may lower blood pressure, depress respiration and there is a risk of dependency. Ketamine might be a better option due to speed of onset and favourable side-effect profile. We sought to compare clinical effectiveness of paramedic administered ketamine and morphine in patients with severe pain following trauma.

Methods: PACKMaN was a double-blinded, randomised controlled, superiority trial, conducted in two regional ambulance services in the UK. Eligible patients were 16 years of age or over, had an acute injury, and articulated a pain score of 7 or greater on a 0-10 numeric rating score (NRS). We excluded pregnant patients, prisoners, those unable to articulate a pain score and anyone lacking capacity. The randomisation list prepared by the study programmer, utilised a permuted, unstratified, block randomisation system (variable size blocks) to achieve an overall ratio of 1:1 control (morphine): intervention (ketamine). Treatment packs were identical in appearance, apart from their unique sequential number. Individual participant randomisation occurred when the attending paramedic opened the treatment pack. The maximum available dose of morphine was 20 mg while the maximum available dose of ketamine was 30 mg. The treating paramedic administered the trial drug slowly, in regular small aliquots, via the intravenous (or intraosseous) route, titrating treatment until the patient reported adequate analgesia or requested that treatment stop due to undesired side effects. Timing of drug administration was not prespecified. The primary outcome was the Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) score on arrival to the hospital, calculated using patient reported NRS scores. Analysis was performed on an intention to treat basis. PACKMaN is registered with the International Clinical Trials Registry (ISRCTN14124474).

Findings: PACKMaN recruited its first patient on 10/11/2021 and achieved its recruitment target on 16/05/2023. We randomised 449 participants: 219 (49%) received ketamine and 230 (51%) received morphine. The SPID score was 3.5 (SD 2.8) for ketamine and 3.4 (SD 3.0) for morphine. We found no significant difference in efficacy between drugs (adjusted mean difference 0.1, 95%CI -0.4 to 0.6, p = 0.74). There was no significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events [4 (2%) ketamine; 8 (3%) morphine]. There were no treatment related deaths.

Interpretation: Ketamine did not provide superior analgesia than morphine when used by paramedics to treat acute severe trauma pain. Unexpected adverse events occurred infrequently. Despite analgesia, many patients still experienced pain on arrival at hospital, highlighting the need for further research.

Funding: PACKMaN was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Keywords: Ambulance; Analgesia; EMS; Ketamine; Morphine; Pain; Paramedic; Prehospital.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

GDP received project funding from the NIHR and is a member of an NIHR funding committee. SP received support as an NIHR Senior Investigator (award number NF-SI-0616-202402) and from the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Oxford and Thames Valley. MAS, HN, JY, RL, FM, GF, AW, ZG, RM, EM and KS have no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
: Trial profile. ∗Participant where drug pack was opened but participant was excluded from trial prior to IMP being administered.

References

    1. Henderson T., Endacott R., Marsden J., Black S. Examining the type and frequency of incidents attended by UK paramedics. J Paramedic Pract. 2019;11(9):396–402.
    1. Berben S.A., Schoonhoven L., Meijs T.H., van Vugt A.B., van Grunsven P.M. Prevalence and relief of pain in trauma patients in emergency medical services. Clin J Pain. 2011;27(7):587–592. - PubMed
    1. Raja S.N., Carr D.B., Cohen M., et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain. 2020;161(9) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brennan F., Carr D.B., Cousins M. Pain management: a fundamental human right. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(1) - PubMed
    1. Chambers J.A., Guly H.R. The need for better pre-hospital analgesia. Arch Emerg Med. 1993;10(3):187–192. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources