Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 17;15(16):12331-12341.
doi: 10.1039/d5ra01341k. eCollection 2025 Apr 16.

High-throughput screening of FDA-approved drugs identifies colchicine as a potential therapeutic agent for atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RTs)

Affiliations

High-throughput screening of FDA-approved drugs identifies colchicine as a potential therapeutic agent for atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RTs)

Phongthon Kanjanasirirat et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is a rare and aggressive tumor of the primary central nervous system primarily affecting children. It typically originates in the cerebellum and brain stem and is associated with a low survival rate. While standard chemotherapy has been used as a primary treatment for AT/RTs, its success rate is unsatisfactory, and patients often experience severe side effects. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop new and effective treatment strategies. One promising approach for identifying new therapies is drug repurposing. Although many FDA-approved drugs have been repurposed for various cancers, there have been no reports of such applications for AT/RTs. In this study, a library of 2130 FDA-approved drugs was screened using a high-throughput screening system against 2D traditional cultures and 3D spheroid cultures of AT/RT cell lines (BT-12 and BT-16). From this screening, colchicine, a non-chemotherapeutic agent, was identified as a promising candidate. It exhibited IC50 values of 0.016 and 0.056 μM against 2D BT-12 and 2D BT-16 cells, respectively, and IC50 values of 0.004 and 0.023 μM against 3D BT-12 and BT-16 spheroid cultures. Additionally, the cytotoxic effects of colchicine on human brain endothelial cells and human astrocytes were evaluated, and CC50 > 20 μM was observed, which is over two orders of magnitude higher than its effective concentrations in AT/RT cells, indicating considerably lower toxicity to normal brain cells and brain endothelial cells. In conclusion, colchicine shows significant potential to be repurposed as a treatment for AT/RTs, providing a safer and more effective therapeutic option for this rare and challenging disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. High-throughput screening of 2130 FDA-approved drugs against AT/RT cells. The primary screening was conducted in BT-12 cells (A) and BT-16 cells (B) using FDA-approved drugs at a concentration of 10 μM. Hit compounds were identified based on their ability to inhibit cancer cell viability by over 80% indicated by the orange dotted line. A total of 104 hit compounds were effective against BT-12 cells and BT-16 cells as shown in (C). Amongst these, 62 compounds were classified as chemotherapeutic drugs (orange dots), while 42 compounds were identified as non-chemotherapeutic drugs (blue dots) (C). Doxorubicin served as the positive control (red dot), and DMSO served as the negative control (green dot).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Dose–response effects of three FDA-approved drug candidates on AT/RT cells. (A) IC50 comparison graph between BT-12 cells and BT-16 cells highlighting the three drug candidates in orange dots. (B) IC50 values of three FDA-approved drugs affect AT/RT cell viability corresponding to the numbered orange dots in (A). (C–F) Dose-dependent effects on BT-12 cell viability for colchicine (C), digoxin (D), emetine (E), with doxorubicin as a control (F). (G–J) Dose-dependent effects on BT-16 cell viability for colchicine (G), digoxin (H), emetine (I), and doxorubicin (J).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Cytotoxicity testing (CC50) of the hit compounds against the normal cells. (A–D) Dose-dependent cytotoxicity effects of colchicine (A), digoxin (B), emetine (C), and doxorubicin (D) on the viability of human cerebral microvascular endothelial cells (hCMEC/D3 cells). (E–H) Dose-dependent cytotoxicity effects of colchicine (E), digoxin (F), emetine (G), and doxorubicin (H) on the viability of primary astrocytes.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Effect of colchicine on three-dimensional (3D) AT/RT spheroid growth models. BT-12 spheroids were treated with colchicine (A) or doxorubicin (B) at varying concentrations. The percentage effect of colchicine (red line) and doxorubicin (dark line) on BT-12 spheroid viability is shown in (C). Similarly, BT-16 spheroids were exposed to colchicine (D) or doxorubicin (E) at the stated concentrations. The percentage effect of colchicine (red line) and doxorubicin (black line) on BT-16 spheroid viability is presented in (F). Hoechst (green) and ethidium homodimer (orange) staining were used to distinguish live and dead cells, respectively.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Proposed antimitotic mechanism of colchicine. Colchicine disrupts microtubule stability by binding to two tubulin heterodimers near the exchangeable GTP-binding site, forming a tubulin-colchicine (TC) complex. This interaction destabilizes tubulin, preventing proper microtubule assembly and arresting mitotic cells at the G2/M phase. As a result, AT/RT cell proliferation is inhibited, particularly in the proliferative zone of 3D AT/RT spheroids, ultimately triggering programmed cell death, often known as apoptosis. The cell cycle consists of four main phases: G1 (first growth phase), where the cell grows and carries out normal metabolic functions; S (synthesis phase), during which DNA replication occurs; G2 (second growth phase), preparing the cell for mitosis; and M (mitotic phase), where nuclear division results in two genetically identical daughter cells. The M phase is further divided into prophase, metaphase, anaphase, and telophase. (Created by BioRender.com/Mahidol University.)

Similar articles

References

    1. Bhattacharjee M. Hicks J. Langford L. Dauser R. Strother D. Chintagumpala M. Horowitz M. Cooley L. Vogel H. Ultrastruct. Pathol. 1997;21:369–378. - PubMed
    1. Gökden N. Nappi O. Swanson P. E. Pfeifer J. D. Vollmer R. T. Wick M. R. Humphrey P. A. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2000;24:1329–1338. - PubMed
    1. Versteege I. Sévenet N. Lange J. Rousseau-Merck M.-F. Ambros P. Handgretinger R. Aurias A. Delattre O. Nature. 1998;394:203–206. - PubMed
    1. Louis D. N. Perry A. Reifenberger G. von Deimling A. Figarella-Branger D. Cavenee W. K. Ohgaki H. Wiestler O. D. Kleihues P. Ellison D. W. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–820. - PubMed
    1. Dho Y. S. Kim S. K. Cheon J. E. Park S. H. Wang K. C. Lee J. Y. Phi J. H. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2015;31:1305–1311. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources