Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 14;7(1):e000973.
doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2024-000973. eCollection 2025.

External validation of the MR PREDICTS@24H model: predicting functional outcome after endovascular treatment in stroke

Affiliations

External validation of the MR PREDICTS@24H model: predicting functional outcome after endovascular treatment in stroke

Jeanette Tas et al. BMJ Neurol Open. .

Abstract

Background: Chalos et al recently developed the MR PREDICTS@24H model to predict 90 days functional outcomes in ischaemic stroke patients following endovascular treatment (EVT). We aimed to validate this model in the real-world situation of endovascular stroke patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including a selection of adult (≥18 years old) ischaemic stroke patients eligible for EVT in a tretiary care center between January 2014 and May 2023. Model performance was assessed using C-statistics for discrimination and calibration plots for goodness of fit.

Results: Among 254 eligible stroke patients, the model demonstrates a strong discriminatory performance for both functional independence (C-statistics 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.95) and survival (C-statistic 0.83; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90). Compared with the MR CLEAN Registry, no significant differences were observed in discriminative ability (functional independence: z-score 0.54, p=0.590; survival: z-score -1.66, p=0.0962).

Conclusions: The MR PREDICTS@24H model reliably predicts outcomes in a real-world setting and may help clinicians in the communication with patient relatives.

Keywords: STROKE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No, there are no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The model input and model performance results for ischaemic stroke patients (n=254). The model input data (A) is provided as median (q1–q3) or frequency (%). (B) The predicted probability of patients with a functional independence (mRS 0–2, n=139; 55%) and (C) the predicted probability of patients who survive (mRS 0–5, n=215; 85%). In addition, the distribution of the probabilities is given. For functional dependence/dead the value 0, and functional independence/alive the value 1. C-statistics, calibration and outcome results are shown in D. Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding. CTA, CT angiography; eTICI, Extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction; ICA, internal carotid artery; ICH, intracerebral haemorrhage; mo, months; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; No., number.

References

    1. Chalos V, Venema E, Mulder MJHL, et al. Development and Validation of a Postprocedural Model to Predict Outcome After Endovascular Treatment for Ischemic Stroke. JAMA Neurol. 2023;80:940–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.2392. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jansen IGH, Mulder MJHL, Goldhoorn R-JB, et al. Endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in routine clinical practice: prospective, observational cohort study (MR CLEAN Registry) BMJ. 2018;360:k949. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k949. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Serles W, Gattringer T, Mutzenbach S, et al. Endovascular stroke therapy in Austria: a nationwide 1-year experience. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23:906–11. doi: 10.1111/ene.12958. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Calster B, Nieboer D, Vergouwe Y, et al. A calibration hierarchy for risk models was defined: from utopia to empirical data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;74:167–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources