The Genomics Revolution in Nonmodel Species: Predictions vs. Reality for Salmonids
- PMID: 40249276
- DOI: 10.1111/mec.17758
The Genomics Revolution in Nonmodel Species: Predictions vs. Reality for Salmonids
Abstract
The increasing feasibility of whole-genome sequencing has been highly anticipated, promising to transform our understanding of the biology of nonmodel species. Notably, dramatic cost reductions beginning around 2007 with the advent of high-throughput sequencing inspired publications heralding the 'genomics revolution', with predictions about its future impacts. Although such predictions served as useful guideposts, value is added when statements are evaluated with the benefit of hindsight. Here, we review 10 key predictions made early in the genomics revolution, highlighting those realised while identifying challenges limiting others. We focus on predictions concerning applied aspects of genomics and examples involving salmonid species which, due to their socioeconomic and ecological significance, have been frontrunners in applications of genomics in nonmodel species. Predicted outcomes included enhanced analytical power, deeper insights into the genetic basis of phenotype and fitness variation, disease management and breeding program advancements. Although many predictions have materialised, several expectations remain unmet due to technological, analytical and knowledge barriers. Additionally, largely unforeseen advancements, including the identification and management applicability of large-effect loci, close-kin mark-recapture, environmental DNA and gene editing have added under-anticipated value. Finally, emerging innovations in artificial intelligence and bioinformatics offer promising new directions. This retrospective evaluation of the impacts of the genomic revolution offers insights into the future of genomics for nonmodel species.
Keywords: Salmon; adaptive diversity; aquaculture; conservation genomics; natural resource management; whole‐genome sequencing.
© 2025 The Author(s). Molecular Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
References
-
- Adams, C. I., M. Knapp, N. J. Gemmell, et al. 2019. “Beyond Biodiversity: Can Environmental DNA (eDNA) Cut It as a Population Genetics Tool?” Genes 10, no. 3: 192.
-
- Ahi, E. P., J. P. Verta, J. Kurko, et al. 2024. “Gene Co‐Expression Patterns in Atlantic Salmon Adipose Tissue Provide a Molecular Link Among Seasonal Changes, Energy Balance and Age at Maturity.” Molecular Ecology: e17313. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17313.
-
- Aleksander, S. A., J. Balhoff, S. Carbon, et al. 2023. “The Gene Ontology Knowledgebase in 2023.” Genetics 224, no. 1: iyad031. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyad031.
-
- Ali, O. A., S. M. O'Rourke, S. J. Amish, et al. 2016. “RAD Capture (Rapture): Flexible and Efficient Sequence‐Based Genotyping.” Genetics 202, no. 2: 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.183665.
-
- Allendorf, F. W., P. A. Hohenlohe, and G. Luikart. 2010. “Genomics and the Future of Conservation Genetics.” Nature Reviews Genetics 11, no. 10: 697–709.
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
