Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 18;26(1):153.
doi: 10.1186/s12931-025-03229-2.

Impact of pleural thickness on the sensitivity of computed tomography scan-guided cutting-needle pleural biopsy in diagnosing unexplained exudative pleural effusion

Affiliations

Impact of pleural thickness on the sensitivity of computed tomography scan-guided cutting-needle pleural biopsy in diagnosing unexplained exudative pleural effusion

Rui Xu et al. Respir Res. .

Abstract

Background: In most cases, patients with pleural effusion require a pleural biopsy to confirm the diagnosis, due to the low diagnostic sensitivity of thoracentesis. Among the different biopsy modalities, real time computed tomography scan-guided cutting-needle pleural biopsy (CT-CNPB) ensures high sensitivity and accessibility. However, there is no study investigating the difference in the diagnostic sensitivity of CT-CNPB for lesions with variable pleural thickness in effusions of different types.

Methods: Of the 303 patients who underwent CT-CNPB, 218 met the eligibility criteria and were retrospectively analyzed from November 2021 to June 2024. Patients were divided into malignant pleural effusion (MPE), tuberculosis pleural effusion (TPE), and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion (BPE) groups according to the diagnosis with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Pleural thickness was defined as the length of the portion of the puncture needle that passes through the thickened parietal pleura or the pleural lesion (nodule/mass). In further analysis, we compare the differences in sensitivity between subgroups with different pleural thicknesses in each group.

Results: The overall diagnostic sensitivity is 74.3%. The sensitivity in MPE, TPE, and BPE is 75.7%, 78.6%, and 67.8%, respectively. There was a significant difference in sensitivity between the < 5 mm and ≥ 5 mm groups in MPE and BPE groups but was not observed in the TPE group. In the further analysis, there was a significant difference in sensitivity between < 3 mm and 3-5 mm groups in TPE (p = 0.046) and a significant difference in sensitivity between 3 and 5 mm and 5-10 mm groups in MPE (p = 0.017), but a significant difference was not observed in BPE group.

Conclusion: CT-CNPB may serve as a preferred diagnostic approach in suspected TPE with pleural thickening ≥ 3 mm and suspected MPE with thickening ≥ 5 mm on chest CT. Where MT is unavailable, CT-CNPB is a viable alternative for suspected MPE or TPE patients with pleural thickening, nodularity, or mass lesions observed on CT. However, in suspected BPE, CT-CNPB alone is often insufficient; integrated clinical, laboratory, and imaging evaluation remains essential.

Keywords: Diagnosis; Exudative pleural effusion; Real time computed tomography scan-guided cutting-needle pleural biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethic committee of the West China Hospital of Sichuan University (No. 2024 − 1582). Written informed consent was waived approved by the ethic committee of the West China Hospital of Sichuan University due to the retrospective noninterventional design. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the study screening and grouping
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Real time computed tomography scan-guided cutting-needle pleural biopsy imaging, the red arrows indicate the entry sites. A, CT imaging of a patient who was subsequently confirmed tuberculosis pleural effusion, with a pleural thickness of 7 mm. B, CT imaging of a patient who was subsequently confirmed malignant pleural effusion, with a pleural mass of 10 mm. C, CT imaging of a patient who was subsequently confirmed tuberculosis pleural effusion, with a pleural thickness of 2 mm
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Diagnostic sensitivity of different pleural thickness subgroups in different types of pleural effusion

Similar articles

References

    1. Roberts ME, Rahman NM, Maskell NA, et al. British thoracic society guideline for pleural disease. Thorax. 2023;78(11):1143–56. 10.1136/thorax-2023-220304. - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Wang W, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of thoracic CT to differentiate transudative from exudative pleural effusion prior to thoracentesis. Respir Res. 2024;25(1):53. 10.1186/s12931-024-02681-w. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez-Panadero F, Janssen JP, Astoul P. Thoracoscopy: general overview and place in the diagnosis and management of pleural effusion. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(2):409–22. 10.1183/09031936.06.00013706. - PubMed
    1. Metintas M, Ak G, Yildirim H, et al. Image-Assısted pleural needle biopsy or medical thoracoscopy: which method for which patient?? A randomızed controlled trial. Chest. 2024;166(2):405–12. 10.1016/j.chest.2024.03.038. - PubMed
    1. Leonhardi J, Dahms U, Schnarkowski B, et al. Impact of radiomics features, pulmonary emphysema score and muscle mass on the rate of pneumothorax and chest tube insertion in CT-guided lung biopsies. Respir Res. 2024;25(1):320. 10.1186/s12931-024-02936-6. - PMC - PubMed