Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves
- PMID: 4025173
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90858-6
Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves
Abstract
One hundred thirty-four patients with prosthetic or bioprosthetic heart valves were investigated with Doppler echocardiography to determine normal values for commonly used prosthetic valves and to test the specificity of abnormal Doppler findings. In 70 patients the aortic valves had been replaced and in 64 the mitral valves had been replaced. Gradients across prostheses in the aortic position were calculated from maximal velocity. Peak calculated aortic transvalvular gradients in normal subjects were 22 +/- 10 mm Hg in 33 Björk-Shiley valves, 23 +/- 10 mm Hg in 27 porcine valves and 29 +/- 13 mm Hg in 6 Starr-Edwards valves. Mild aortic regurgitation was seen in 42% of Björk-Shiley valves, 26% of porcine valves and 2 of 6 Starr-Edwards valves. Mitral valve orifice was calculated by the pressure half-time method. In clinically normal patients with mitral valve prostheses, the effective mitral valve orifice was 2.5 +/- 0.8 cm2 in 35 Björk-Shiley valves, 2.1 +/- 0.7 cm2 in 17 porcine valves, and 2.0 +/- 0.3 cm2 in 10 Starr-Edwards valves. Mitral regurgitation was found in 11% of Björk-Shiley valves, 19% of porcine valves and 30% of Starr-Edwards valves. Repeat studies at 2 weeks to 14 months revealed no difference in 8 aortic and 14 mitral prostheses. Seven aortic and 4 mitral valves functioned abnormally as determined by Doppler, and the abnormal function was confirmed in each at surgery or at cardiac catheterization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Aug;8(2):317-26. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80046-8. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986. PMID: 2942593
-
[Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses].G Ital Cardiol. 1988 Feb;18(2):121-34. G Ital Cardiol. 1988. PMID: 3410201 Italian.
-
Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of Hancock and Björk-Shiley prosthetic values.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Mar;7(3):681-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80480-6. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986. PMID: 3950245
-
Current status of the Beall, Bjork-Shiley, Braunwald-Cutter, Lillehei-Kaster and Smeloff-Cutter cardiac valve prostheses.Am J Cardiol. 1975 Jun;35(6):855-65. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(75)90122-8. Am J Cardiol. 1975. PMID: 124127 Review.
-
Doppler echocardiography assessment of prosthetic heart valves.Echocardiography. 1990 Mar;7(2):97-114. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.1990.tb00353.x. Echocardiography. 1990. PMID: 10149195 Review.
Cited by
-
Limitations of Doppler ultrasound in the assessment of the function of prosthetic mitral valves.Br Heart J. 1990 Mar;63(3):189-94. doi: 10.1136/hrt.63.3.189. Br Heart J. 1990. PMID: 2183860 Free PMC article.
-
Doppler echocardiographic characteristics of normal and dysfunctioning prosthetic valves in the tricuspid and mitral position.Br Heart J. 1990 Jan;63(1):41-4. doi: 10.1136/hrt.63.1.41. Br Heart J. 1990. PMID: 2310643 Free PMC article.
-
Left ventricular dynamics after aortic valve replacement: a long-term, combined radionuclide angiographic and ultrasonographic study.Tex Heart Inst J. 1992;19(2):97-106. Tex Heart Inst J. 1992. PMID: 15227421 Free PMC article.
-
Echocardiographic assessment of artificial heart valves: British Society of Echocardiography position paper.Br Heart J. 1994 Apr;71(4 Suppl):6-14. doi: 10.1136/hrt.71.4_suppl.6. Br Heart J. 1994. PMID: 8011398 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Doppler measurement of cardiac output across prosthetic mitral valves.Klin Wochenschr. 1990 Mar 5;68(5):263-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02116054. Klin Wochenschr. 1990. PMID: 2325355
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources