Consensus recommendations regarding local and metastasis-directed therapies in the management of relapsed/recurrent Ewing sarcoma
- PMID: 40251761
- PMCID: PMC12008482
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35858
Consensus recommendations regarding local and metastasis-directed therapies in the management of relapsed/recurrent Ewing sarcoma
Abstract
Limited randomized or prospective data are available to guide local/metastasis directed therapy (LMDT) in relapsed/recurrent Ewing sarcoma (RR-ES), resulting in uncertainty regarding best clinical practice for these patients. This report reviews the available literature on LMDT approaches and provides consensus recommendations regarding therapeutic decision making, timing, and indications for the use of LMDT in the management of RR-ES. LMDT should be considered on a case-by-case basis to assess appropriateness, optimal timing/modality, palliative versus curative intent, and its role in relation to chemotherapy. One commonly used LMDT is radiotherapy (RT), which can be delivered through standard, hypofractionated, or stereotactic techniques based on factors including prior RT, tumor size, and/or location. Chemotherapy can be combined with RT, although prospective data are limited in the relapse setting. Surgery for LMDT not only addresses the tumor but also provides tissue for analysis, though the potential surgical morbidity based on location, extent of resection, and recovery complications should be considered. Interventional radiology approaches also can procure tumor tissue while delivering LMDT; there are several different procedures available based on the location, size, and extent of disease. Finally, a combination of LMDT approaches can be used for patients with RR-ES. Decisions regarding the management of RR-ES should involve a multidisciplinary team and factor in the burden of disease, progression-free interval, life expectancy, toxicity profiles of LMDT, and quality of life. In such patients, informed and shared decision making with patients and their families is paramount.
Keywords: consensus recommendations, Ewing sarcoma; interventional oncology; interventional radiology; local control; radiation therapy; surgery.
© 2025 The Author(s). Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Chirag Shah reports grants/contracts from PreludeDX and Varian Medical Systems Inc.; and personal/consulting fees from ImpediMed Inc., PreludeDX, and Videra Surgical outside submitted work. Erin Murphy reports personal/consulting fees from Autonomix outside the submitted work. Odion Binitie reports personal/consulting fees from Onkos Surgical Inc. outside the submitted work. Stephen Hunt reports personal/consulting fees from Boston Scientific Corporation, GE Healthcare, GEURBET LLC, and Varian Medical Systems Inc.; and stock ownership in Vivaldi Therapeutics outside the submitted work. The remaining authors disclosed no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- McCabe M, Kirton L, Khan M, et al. Phase III assessment of topotecan and cyclophosphamide and high‐dose ifosfamide in rEECur: an international randomized controlled trial of chemotherapy for the treatment of recurrent and primary refractory Ewing sarcoma (RR‐ES) [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 17):LBA2. doi:10.1200/jco.2022.40.17_suppl.lba2 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
