Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug;114(8):1803-1812.
doi: 10.1111/apa.70095. Epub 2025 Apr 18.

Infant Reference Intervals-Steps Towards Improving the Supportive Data for Result Interpretation

Affiliations
Review

Infant Reference Intervals-Steps Towards Improving the Supportive Data for Result Interpretation

Sara Marie Larsson. Acta Paediatr. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: To fully take advantage of blood test results, comparative data are required. Today, the reference interval is a commonly used concept. This review aims to summarise the current state of reference intervals, focusing on infants.

Methods: Literature on reference percentiles (birth to 12 months of age) published from January 1950 until November 2024 was reviewed. Search terms comprised paediatric, infant, or neonatal reference intervals and similar terminology. Furthermore, reference interval data in current clinical use were investigated by searching 7 Nordic laboratory websites for three routinely used biomarkers.

Results: During infancy, the levels of several biomarkers change rapidly with development and growth. Conventionally used techniques for deriving reference intervals have limitations and require extensive blood samplings. New approaches basing reference limits on mathematically trimmed data from laboratory systems have emerged. Due to the risk of modelling pathological data, the results of these studies need verification. Recently published Nordic reference interval data, based on healthy infants and defined on specified time points, could present new opportunities.

Conclusion: Infant reference interval methodology requires particular consideration. The currently observed heterogeneity in this area calls for further methodological investigations, improved concepts, harmonisation activities, and software development.

Keywords: infancy; infant; neonatal; paediatrics; reference intervals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Schroeder A. R. and Dang R., “Defining Normal,” JAMA Pediatrics 176, no. 7 (2022): 644–645, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0801. - DOI - PubMed
    1. CLSI , Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline‐Third Edition (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2008) (CLSI document EP28‐A3c).
    1. Dufendach K. R., Lehmann C. U., Spooner S. A., and Council on Clinical Information Technology , “Special Requirements of Electronic Health Record Systems in Pediatrics: Clinical Report,” Pediatrics 154, no. 4 (2024): e2024068509, 10.1542/peds.2024-068509. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colantonio D. A., Kyriakopoulou L., Chan M. K., et al., “Closing the Gaps in Pediatric Laboratory Reference Intervals: A CALIPER Database of 40 Biochemical Markers in a Healthy and Multiethnic Population of Children,” Clinical Chemistry 58, no. 5 (2012): 854–868, 10.1373/clinchem.2011.177741. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ridefelt P., Hilsted L., Juul A., Hellberg D., and Rustad P., “Pediatric Reference Intervals for General Clinical Chemistry Components—Merging of Studies From Denmark and Sweden,” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 78, no. 5 (2018): 365–372, 10.1080/00365513.2018.1474493. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources