Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr;19(4):e70101.
doi: 10.1111/irv.70101.

Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in People who Have Contact With Birds

Affiliations

Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in People who Have Contact With Birds

Amy Thomas et al. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Following the 2021-2022 avian influenza panzootic in birds and wildlife, seasonal influenza vaccines have been advised to occupationally high-risk groups to reduce the likelihood of coincidental infection in humans with both seasonal and avian influenza A viruses.

Methods: We developed and launched a questionnaire aimed at poultry workers and people in direct contact with birds to understand awareness and uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination. We collected responses in-person at an agricultural trade event and online.

Findings: The questionnaire was completed by 225 individuals from across the United Kingdom. The most commonly reported reason for vaccination was protection against seasonal influenza (82%, 63 of 77). Nearly, all individuals aged ≥65 years reported that the vaccine was recommended for them (24 of 28). There was no difference in recommendation for occupational groups. Most vaccinees were aged over 60 years (60%, 29 of 48); however, coverage was lower than expected in the ≥ 65 target group. Vaccination in those exposed to avian influenza was low (32%, 9 of 28). Not having enough time was the single most reported reason for not getting vaccinated in those intending to. Individuals unintending to be vaccinated perceived natural immunity to be better than receiving the vaccine as well as lack of awareness and time.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that targeted campaigns in occupationally exposed groups need to be undertaken to improve communication of information and access to vaccine clinics. We recommend co-production methods to optimise this public health strategy for increased knowledge and future vaccine uptake.

Keywords: influenza; public health policy; seasonal influenza; vaccination; zoonotic influenza.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LES, RP and RPu are employees of the UK Health Security Agency. LES receives consultancy fees from the Sanofi group of companies and other life sciences companies. PM is an employee of the Animal Plant and Health Agency. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UKHSA or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Distribution of respondent age, gender and occupation (a) Age distribution of respondents grouped by gender—female in red and male in blue (note one ‘Other’ and one NA response not plotted). (b) Top 4 occupations reported (occupations with fewer than five observations grouped with ‘Other’).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Seasonal influenza vaccine recommendation and uptake. (a) Proportion self‐reporting recommendation to receive seasonal influenza vaccine by age. (b) Proportion self‐reporting recommendation to receive seasonal influenza vaccine by occupation. (c) Proportion of individuals receiving seasonal influenza vaccine in the last 12 months by age. (d) Proportion of individuals receiving seasonal influenza vaccine in the last 12 months by eligibility/risk group. Those considered ‘at‐risk’ reported being exposed to avian influenza virus (AIV). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals for single proportion.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Reasons for seasonal influenza vaccination. (a) reasons for receiving the seasonal influenza vaccine among vaccinated individuals, (b) reasons preventing an individual from becoming vaccinated among individuals intending to be vaccinated, (c) factors influencing indecision or decision to not be vaccinated among those not intending to be vaccinated.

Similar articles

References

    1. Petrova V. N. and Russell C. A., “The Evolution of Seasonal Influenza Viruses,” Nature Reviews. Microbiology 16, no. 1 (2018): 47–60, 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.118. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou N. N., Senne D. A., Landgraf J. S., et al., “Genetic Reassortment of Avian, Swine, and Human Influenza A Viruses in American Pigs,” Journal of Virology 73, no. 10 (1999): 8851–8856, 10.1128/JVI.73.10.8851-8856.1999. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neumann G., Noda T., and Kawaoka Y., “Emergence and Pandemic Potential of Swine‐Origin H1N1 Influenza Virus,” Nature 459, no. 7249 (2009): 931–939, 10.1038/nature08157. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sonnberg S., Webby R. J., and Webster R. G., “Natural History of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1,” Virus Research 178, no. 1 (2013): 63–77, 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.05.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dhingra M. S., Artois J., Dellicour S., et al., “Geographical and Historical Patterns in the Emergences of Novel Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5 and H7 Viruses in Poultry,” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 5, no. JUN (2018): 84, 10.3389/fvets.2018.00084. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources