Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 May 13;14(5):piaf028.
doi: 10.1093/jpids/piaf028.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Neonates and Young Infants: A Phase 2a, Multicenter Prospective Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Neonates and Young Infants: A Phase 2a, Multicenter Prospective Trial

John Bradley et al. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. .

Abstract

Background: This phase 2a study evaluated pharmacokinetics and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI; combination dosed as fixed 4:1 ratio) in neonates and young infants with suspected/confirmed infections due to Gram-negative pathogens requiring intravenous antibiotics.

Methods: Hospitalized neonates and infants (gestational age ≥ 26 weeks to < 3 months), enrolled sequentially into 3 age cohorts, received CAZ/AVI single dose (Part A) or multiple dose every 8 h (Part B) by 2-h intravenous infusions. Infants > 28 days (Cohort 1) received CAZ/AVI 37.5 mg/kg/dose (CAZ 30 mg/kg and AVI 7.5 mg/kg). Full-term neonates ≤ 28 days (Cohort 2) and preterm neonates ≤ 28 days (Cohort 3) received 25 mg/kg/dose (CAZ 20 mg/kg and AVI 5 mg/kg). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and clinical and microbiological outcomes (Part B only) were assessed descriptively.

Results: Forty-six patients received CAZ/AVI, 25 in Part A and 21 in Part B. Sepsis (39.1%) and urinary tract infection (15.2%) were the predominant diagnoses. Observed drug plasma-concentration time profiles were generally similar across cohorts. Overall, 23 patients (50%) had ≥ 1 adverse event (AE), 8 patients (17.4%) had ≥ 1 serious AE (SAE), and 2 patients (4.3%) died; no SAE or death was treatment related. In Part B, ≥ 80% of patients had favorable clinical and microbiological responses.

Conclusions: Plasma exposures after single and multiple CAZ/AVI doses in neonates and young infants < 3 months old (37.5 [30/7.5] mg/kg/dose for > 28 days; 25 [20/5] mg/kg/dose for ≤ 28 days) were similar to approved doses for older children. The safety profile of CAZ/AVI was as expected based on previous observations. Study funded by Pfizer. Trial registration: NCT04126031.

Keywords: Gram-negative bacteria; antibiotic therapy; antimicrobial resistance; neonatal infection; sepsis.

Plain language summary

In neonates and young infants with suspected/confirmed infections due to Gram-negative pathogens requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment, plasma drug concentrations after single and multiple doses of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) were generally similar between age cohorts. CAZ/AVI was generally well tolerated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.B. has no personal financial relationship with any company that develops, studies, or markets antibiotics. His employer, the University of California, has contracts for clinical trials and consultation with Pfizer, Merck, Shionogi, Innoviva, GSK, Melinta, and Nabriva. E.R. has received research grants to his institution from Merck, AbbVie, Shionogi, Cidara Therapeutics, and Pfizer Inc.; and is a scientific advisor and member of the speaker bureau for Gilead, Merck, Shionogi, Mundipharma, and Pfizer Inc. M.T. is a former employee of Pfizer Inc. J.Y., G.G.S., and R.E. are employees of Pfizer Inc. E.S. is an employee of Pfizer R&D UK Ltd. S.K. is an employee of Pfizer India Ltd. P.I. is an employee of Pfizer UK Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient Disposition. In Part A, 2 enrolled patients discontinued from the screening phase prior to receiving study treatment: 1 patient due to withdrawal by parent/guardian and 1 patient due to “other” (parents wished to discontinue because the vein catheter was not working). In Part B, 1 patient (Cohort 2) was discontinued from the treatment phase after receiving 1 dose of study treatment due to sudden onset hypertransaminasemia which was attributed to a previous surgical procedure (of note, the blood sample that indicated hypertransaminasemia was taken prior to administration of the first dose of CAZ/AVI). The investigator decided to continue treatment with commercial CAZ/AVI at the protocol-specified dose, but with the patient excluded from any pharmacokinetic assessments or analysis of efficacy. Cohort 1: Full-term infants with chronological age > 28 days to < 3 months or preterm infants with corrected age > 28 days to < 3 months. Cohort 2: Full-term neonates with chronological age from birth to ≤ 28 days. Cohort 3: Preterm neonates from birth to chronological age ≤ 28 days. AE, adverse event; CAZ/AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Median Plasma Concentrations of Ceftazidime and Avibactam (Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set, Excludes a Patient with a Medication Error in Part A) Median plasma concentration of (A) ceftazidime and (B) avibactam. Error bars represent % coefficient of variation. Data for Part A and Part B offset around each nominal time point for improved visualization. Cohort 1: Full-term infants with chronological age > 28 days to < 3 months or preterm infants with corrected age > 28 days to < 3 months. Cohort 2: Full-term neonates with chronological age from birth to ≤ 28 days. Cohort 3: Preterm neonates from birth to chronological age ≤ 28 days.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, et al.; Lancet Every Newborn Study Group. Every newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014;384:189–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fleischmann C, Reichert F, Cassini A, et al.Global incidence and mortality of neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2021;106:745–752. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-320217 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li J, Xiang L, Chen X, et al.Global, regional, and national burden of neonatal sepsis and other neonatal infections, 1990-2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Eur J Pediatr. 2023;182:2335–2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04911-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang J, Zhang H, Yan J, Zhang T.. Literature review on the distribution characteristics and antimicrobial resistance of bacterial pathogens in neonatal sepsis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35:861–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1732342 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lipworth S, Vihta K-D, Davies T, et al.Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance phenotype of paediatric bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. Commun Med (Lond). 2022;2:101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-022-00161-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

Grants and funding