Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun:224:112193.
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112193. Epub 2025 Apr 17.

Non-adherence to diabetes microvascular complications follow-up screening in the primary care population: Predictors, associated barriers, and facilitators

Affiliations
Free article

Non-adherence to diabetes microvascular complications follow-up screening in the primary care population: Predictors, associated barriers, and facilitators

Eva K Fenwick et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2025 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Aims: We determined the rates, predictors, and barriers/facilitators of non-adherence to annual follow-up screenings for Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), nephropathy (DN) and foot complications (DFC) screening in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: This prospective, mixed-method, clinical study, included 934 patients (mean ± SD age 60.4 ± 9.4 years, 46.9 % women) who underwent DR/DN/DFC screenings (N = 2012 appointments). Logistic regression analysis determined the baseline predictors of non-adherence to follow-up screening (failure to attend annual follow-up screening within ± 4 months). Qualitative interviews on barriers/facilitators of screening adherence were conducted with 36/24 non-adherent/adherent patients and 9 healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Results: Non-adherence rates to DR, DFC and DN follow-up screening were 27.6 % (n = 186), 29.8 % (n = 225) and 12.7 % (n = 74), respectively. Predictors included higher total cholesterol (DR); poor self-rated Diabetes Control (DN); and higher satisfaction with diabetes support (DFC and DN). Better self-efficacy was protective (DFC). Poor HCP-patient communication and long waiting times were patient-reported barriers to adherence, while knowledge about benefits of diabetes complications screening was a facilitator. Time constraints prevented HCPs from reinforcing the importance of screening to patients.

Conclusions: Non-adherence to diabetic microvascular complications follow-up screening was suboptimal in Singapore and driven by multi-faceted predictors and barriers. Targeted interventions are needed to improve follow-up screening adherence.

Keywords: Diabetes complication; Microvascular; Predictors; Qualitative; Rates; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources