Comparison of the residual unipolar voltage following left atrial posterior wall isolation with radiofrequency and cryoballoon catheters for persistent atrial fibrillation
- PMID: 40252886
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.04.025
Comparison of the residual unipolar voltage following left atrial posterior wall isolation with radiofrequency and cryoballoon catheters for persistent atrial fibrillation
Abstract
Background: Achieving transmural lesions during left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) is challenging, and the differences in lesion transmurality between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA) remain unclear. Endocardial unipolar voltage mapping is reported to be more sensitive than bipolar voltage mapping for detecting intramural viable myocardium, with 1.08 mV as the cutoff threshold in the atria.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the residual unipolar LAPW potentials after LAPWI of persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) between RFA and CBA and assess their association with atrial arrhythmia recurrence.
Methods: We enrolled 183 patients with PersAF who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and LAPWI, both evaluated as successful using bipolar voltage mapping. Among them, 97 underwent RFA (RFA group) and 86 CBA (CBA group). Residual unipolar LAPW potentials >1.08 mV were analyzed, along with residual potential area, maximum voltage, and arrhythmia recurrence rates.
Results: Residual LAPW unipolar potentials >1.08 mV were more common in the RFA group than CBA group (29.9% vs 15.1%; P = .018), with larger potential areas (1.7 ± 3.6 cm2 vs 0.25 ± 0.69 cm2; P <.001) and higher maximum voltages (0.83 ± 0.41 mV vs 0.69 ± 0.32 mV; P = .0093). The 1-year atrial arrhythmia recurrence rate was higher in the RFA group patients with residual LAPW potentials (36.1% vs 18.0%; P = .033), whereas no significant difference was observed in the CBA group (15.4% vs 18.7%; P = .98).
Conclusion: Residual unipolar LAPW potentials were more prevalent and associated with arrhythmia recurrence following RFA, whereas those residual potentials had no significant impact on recurrence after CBA.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Cryoballoon ablation; Left atrial posterior wall isolation; Radiofrequency ablation.
Copyright © 2025 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures The authors have no conflicts to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Differences in the feasibility, anatomical parameters predicting procedural difficulty, and isolation area of a left atrial posterior wall isolation using radiofrequency versus cryoballoon catheters.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;46(11):1393-1402. doi: 10.1111/pace.14821. Epub 2023 Sep 14. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023. PMID: 37708321
-
One-year clinical and safety outcome of obese patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation with pulsed field ablation or cryoballoon ablation: A propensity-matched analysis.Heart Rhythm. 2025 Aug;22(8):e328-e335. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1999. Epub 2025 Apr 4. Heart Rhythm. 2025. PMID: 40188998
-
Pulsed field ablation in the elderly by a pentaspline multielectrode catheter: Safety, efficacy, and comparison with cryoballoon and radiofrequency devices.Heart Rhythm. 2025 Jul;22(7):e30-e39. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.01.025. Epub 2025 Jan 24. Heart Rhythm. 2025. PMID: 39864479
-
Indirect Comparison of Cryoablation and Radiofrequency Ablation as Initial Therapy for Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Cardiology. 2023;148(2):138-149. doi: 10.1159/000528758. Epub 2023 Jan 3. Cardiology. 2023. PMID: 36596284
-
Meta-Analysis of Thermal Versus Pulse Field Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation Durability in Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From Repeat Ablation.Clin Cardiol. 2025 Jun;48(6):e70151. doi: 10.1002/clc.70151. Clin Cardiol. 2025. PMID: 40437855 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical