Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 19;10(1):76.
doi: 10.1038/s41541-025-01120-1.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to increase the uptake of vaccines recommended during pregnancy

Affiliations

Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to increase the uptake of vaccines recommended during pregnancy

Annette K Regan et al. NPJ Vaccines. .

Abstract

Although immunization during pregnancy can protect mothers and their infants from vaccine-preventable morbidity and mortality, vaccination rates are often poor. We systematically reviewed the literature from inception to July 4, 2023, for randomized and non-randomized quasi-experimental studies estimating the effects of interventions to increase vaccination during pregnancy. Of 9331 studies screened, 36 met inclusion criteria, including 18 demand-side interventions, 11 supply-side interventions, and seven multi-level (demand and supply-side) interventions. Demand-side interventions commonly addressed patient education, showing modest improvement (pooled RR 1.18; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.33; I2 = 63.1%, low certainty). Supply-side interventions commonly implemented Assessment-Feedback-Incentive-eXchange interventions with little improvement (pooled RR 1.13; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.33; I2 = 94.0%, low certainty). Multi-level interventions were modestly effective in increasing vaccination (pooled RR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.42; I2 = 97%, very low certainty). Interventions identified in the literature mostly resulted in low to moderate increases in vaccination with likely high heterogeneity and low to very low certainty in the findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Selection of studies.
PRISMA diagram for selection of studies evaluating the effect of interventions to increase the uptake of vaccines recommended during pregnancy.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Effect of patient-level (demand-side) interventions.
Individual and pooled effect estimates for interventions that target patient-level demand-side interventions to increase the uptake of recommended vaccines during pregnancy. Pooled effect estimates were estimated by random effects meta-analysis overall and by intervention. CI indicates 95% confidence intervals, and RR indicates relative risk estimates.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Effect of supply-side interventions targeting health systems and/or healthcare providers.
Individual and pooled effect estimates for interventions that target health systems and/or healthcare providers to increase the uptake of recommended vaccines during pregnancy. Pooled effect estimates were estimated by random effects meta-analysis overall and by intervention. AFIX indicates Assessment, Feedback, Incentive, eXchange programs, CI indicates 95% confidence intervals, and RR indicates relative risk estimates.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Effect of demand and supply-side interventions.
Individual and pooled effect estimates for demand and supply-side interventions to increase the uptake of recommended vaccines during pregnancy. Pooled effect estimates were estimated by random effects meta-analysis. CI indicates 95% confidence intervals, and RR indicates relative risk estimates.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Community preventive services task force framework for increasing vaccination.
The Community Preventive Services Task Force framework for increasing vaccination rates recommends using a combination of community-based and healthcare system-based interventions to increase demand and supply of vaccines (SOURCE: https://www.thecommunityguide.org/topics/vaccination.html).

Similar articles

References

    1. Jones, C. & Heath, P. Antenatal immunization. Hum. Vaccin Immunother.10, 2118–2122 (2014). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vygen-Bonnet, S. et al. Safety and effectiveness of acellular pertussis vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic review. BMC Infect. Dis.20, 136 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fu, W. et al. Systematic review of the safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant and lactating individuals and their infants. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.10.1002/ijgo.14008 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Omer, S. B. Maternal immunization. N. Engl. J. Med376, 1256–1267 (2017). - PubMed
    1. Munoz, F. M. & Jamieson, D. J. Maternal immunization. Obstet. Gynecol.133, 739–753 (2019). - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources