Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun;39(9):1662-1672.
doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03801-6. Epub 2025 Apr 19.

Updates on novel and traditional OCT and OCTA biomarkers in nAMD

Affiliations
Review

Updates on novel and traditional OCT and OCTA biomarkers in nAMD

Emanuele Crincoli et al. Eye (Lond). 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Predictivity of optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination for the development of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) was demonstrated to be superior compared to other methods, suggesting it as an elective method for screening purposes. Moreover, OCT and OCT angiography (OCTA) have enabled us to provide accurate prognostic information to nAMD patients. Along with well-known prognostic biomarkers, such as the presence of reticular pseudodrusen, the volume of the pigment epithelial detachment (PED), subretinal fluid (SRF), intraretinal fluid (IRF) and hyperreflective foci (HRF), emerging parameters show promising results and may allow a further refinement of prediction and customization of treatment and follow up strategies. This review of the literature discusses the main OCT and OCTA biomarkers reported in literature for nAMD, with a special focus on recent updates on the subject. Future perspectives of clinical applications include the development of artificial intelligence models considering all the described biomarkers to allow automatic and detailed characterization of each lesion based on imaging information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MP reports personal fees from Abbvie, Novartis, Bayer, Roche, Zeiss, outside the submitted work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Korva-Gurung I, Kubin AM, Ohtonen P, Hautala N Incidence and prevalence of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 15-year epidemiological study in a population-based cohort in Finland. Annals of Medicine [Internet]. 2023 Dec 12 [cited 2024 May 1]; Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07853890.2023.2222545. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sivaprasad S, Banister K, Azuro-Blanco A, Goulao B, Cook JA, Hogg R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of monitoring tests of fellow eyes in patients with unilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration: early detection of neovascular age-related macular degeneration study. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:1736–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banister K, Cook JA, Scotland G, Azuara-Blanco A, Goulão B, Heimann H, et al. Non-invasive testing for early detection of neovascular macular degeneration in unaffected second eyes of older adults: EDNA diagnostic accuracy study. Health Technol Assess. 2022;26:1–142. - PubMed
    1. Maggio E, Polito A, Guerriero M, Prigione G, Parolini B, Pertile G. Vitreomacular adhesion and the risk of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:657–66. - PubMed
    1. Horozoglu Ceran T, Sonmez K, Kirtil G. The impact of vitreomacular traction on vitreous vascular endothelial growth factor and placental growth factor levels in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients. Eye. 2024;11:1–6. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources