Development of a checklist for systematic screening of precipitating factors in older patients admitted to hospital with delirium
- PMID: 40253658
- PMCID: PMC12174225
- DOI: 10.1007/s41999-025-01191-2
Development of a checklist for systematic screening of precipitating factors in older patients admitted to hospital with delirium
Abstract
Objectives: Causes of delirium are often multiple in older people and a significant number of them are missed at the initial assessment. We wanted to develop a checklist to help clinicians to systematically screen for the most frequent and important causes of delirium in this population.
Methods: Three investigators, based on previous studies, drafted three possible checklist base models, comprising 18-29 items. A panel of 12 experts voted to choose one of the models, and then followed a modified Delphi consensus method to review each item and further develop the checklist. The consensus checklist was then tested in a small group of patients. The target population was older patients with delirium arriving to the emergency department or to a medical hospital ward.
Results: The longest of the three drafts was unanimously chosen by the panel. After three rounds, a consensus was reached and a final checklist agreed. It is composed by 27 items organized in five groups of causes: infections, hydro-electrolytic disturbances, drugs, acute neurological conditions, and other acute diseases. A pilot study conducted by 15 physicians in 21 consecutive patients showed that the checklist was easy to complete, quick (mean 4 min) and most clinicians, though it helped them through the initial diagnostic work.
Conclusions: We have developed and pilot tested a checklist for screening for acute precipitants of delirium in older patients, aimed to facilitate early recognition and treatment of the multiple causes that often coexists in this population.
Keywords: Checklist; Clinical diagnosis; Delirium; Etiology; Older people; Precipitating factors.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: Dr Lafuente-Lafuente received honoraria for lectures from Boheringer, support for attending meetings from Pfizer. Pr Belmin received honoraria for lectures and participation on advisory boards from Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Janssen. Dr Evany Candia, Dr Oquendo, Pr Freund, Pr Pautas have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethical statement: The pilot study was approved by the corresponding regional ethics committee (Comité de Protection de Personnes d’Île-de-France II, study number 21.00279.000003 RIPH3 HPS). Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all participants included.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Global Delphi consensus on treatment goals for generalized pustular psoriasis.Br J Dermatol. 2025 Mar 18;192(4):706-716. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae491. Br J Dermatol. 2025. PMID: 39844356
-
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025. PMID: 40493548 Free PMC article.
-
CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomized trials.Nat Med. 2025 Jun;31(6):1776-1783. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03635-5. Epub 2025 Apr 15. Nat Med. 2025. PMID: 40229553 Review.
-
Use of β-adrenoreceptor drugs and Parkinson's disease incidence in women from the French E3N cohort study.J Parkinsons Dis. 2025 Jun;15(4):789-804. doi: 10.1177/1877718X251330993. Epub 2025 Apr 29. J Parkinsons Dis. 2025. PMID: 40302366
-
SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomized trials.Nat Med. 2025 Jun;31(6):1784-1792. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03668-w. Epub 2025 Apr 29. Nat Med. 2025. PMID: 40295741 Review.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5 Task Force (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Arlington
-
- Chen F, Liu L, Wang Y, Liu Y, Fan L, Chi J (2022) Delirium prevalence in geriatric emergency department patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 59:121–128. 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.05.058 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical