Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Apr;16(2):e13806.
doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13806.

Effectiveness of Mind-Body Exercise in Older Adults With Sarcopenia and Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of Mind-Body Exercise in Older Adults With Sarcopenia and Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ruihan Wan et al. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025 Apr.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Mind-body exercise (MBE) has shown promise in mitigating the effects of sarcopenia and frailty in older adults. Nevertheless, its effectiveness in enhancing muscle function and physical performance in this population has not been well established. This study aimed to investigate the effects of MBE on older adults with sarcopenia and frailty, to offer evidence-based exercise recommendations.

Methods: A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted through multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, and Chinese Scientific Journals Full-Text Database (VIP), supplemented by manual reference searches from inception until February 2024. The eligible RCTs compared MBE with passive or active exercise controls, focusing on muscle function and physical performance in older adults aged 60 years or above. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the types, duration, and frequency of MBE.

Results: Nine eligible RCTs with 1838 participants were included in this study. MBE demonstrated significant improvements compared with passive control, particularly in grip strength (WMD [weighted mean difference] = 0.99; 95% CI [95% confidence interval] = 0.06, 1.92; I2 = 3%, p = 0.04), Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) (WMD = -4.04; 95% CI = -5.54, -2.53; I2 = 12%, p < 0.01), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) scores (WMD = 3.63; 95% CI = 0.38, 6.87; I2 = 0%, p = 0.03). Even when compared to active exercise training, improvements were still observed in TUGT and BBS (p < 0.001), with a trend toward improved grip strength (WMD = -2.20; 95% CI = -4.35, -0.04; p = 0.05). No positive effect on muscle mass was observed. Subgroup analysis indicated that MBE performed more than 5 times a week for a short or medium duration (4-24 weeks) could improve grip strength (p < 0.05). Moderate-frequency intervention over a short period in this population yielded greater improvements in gait speed and Chair Rise Test completion time (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: MBE can enhance muscle function and physical performance to some extent in older adults with sarcopenia and frailty, whether they are compared with passive or active exercise training. However, positive effects on muscle mass have not been observed. Future studies are warranted to compare it with well-designed active exercise training programs that match the exercise volume, to draw more definitive conclusions to support the notion that MBE yields comparable effects.

Keywords: meta‐analysis; mind–body exercise; older adults; sarcopenia and frailty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flowchart for searching of the included studies.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Risk of bias graph and summary of each included study. The numeral ‘2’ in Zhu2 et al., 2019 is appended to differentiate between two studies by authors sharing the surname Zhu and published in the same year (2019).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forest plots for comparing MBE with different control groups on various indicators. (A) MBE vs. passive control; (B) MBE vs. active control; (C) MBE vs. passive control/active control on BBS. The numeral ‘2’ in Zhu2 et al., 2019 is appended to differentiate between two studies by authors sharing the surname Zhu and published in the same year (2019). The letters a, b, and c represent the first, second, and third intervention time points, respectively. MBE, mind–body exercise; TUGT, Timed‐Up‐and‐Go test; BBS, Berg Balance Scale; CRT, Chair Rise Test; 6mWT, 6‐min Walk Test.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Publication bias funnel plots of standard errors and effect sizes of the included studies. SMD, standard mean difference.

References

    1. Cruz‐Jentoft A. J. and Sayer A. A., “Sarcopenia,” Lancet 393 (2019): 2636–2646. - PubMed
    1. Dent E., Martin F. C., Bergman H., Woo J., Romero‐Ortuno R., and Walston J. D., “Management of Frailty: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions,” Lancet 394 (2019): 1376–1386. - PubMed
    1. Cruz‐Jentoft A. J., Bahat G., Bauer J., et al., “Sarcopenia: Revised European Consensus on Definition and Diagnosis,” Age and Ageing 48 (2019): 16–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Larsson L., Degens H., Li M., et al., “Sarcopenia: Aging‐Related Loss of Muscle Mass and Function,” Physiological Reviews 99 (2019): 427–511. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coto‐Montes A., González‐Blanco L., Antuña E., et al., “The Interactome in the Evolution From Frailty to Sarcopenic Dependence,” Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology 9 (2021): 792825. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources