Forecasting the Global Economic and Health Burden of COPD From 2025 Through 2050
- PMID: 40254152
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.03.029
Forecasting the Global Economic and Health Burden of COPD From 2025 Through 2050
Abstract
Background: Studies have reported estimates of the economic and health burden of COPD. They have been limited largely to current-day estimates or relatively short-term future projections.
Research question: How will the regional and global economic and health burden of COPD evolve from 2025 to 2050, considering trends in COPD risk factors and an expanding population?
Study design and methods: To project the economic and health burden of COPD to 2050, an open cohort Markov model was developed. COPD costs were stratified by age, sex, and smoking status, and distributions of COPD severity grades were modeled based on global trends in smoking status, household air pollution, particulate matter ≤ 2.5 μm in diameter, and ozone. Direct costs, indirect costs, and the number of COPD exacerbations were projected to 2050. Data on the historic economic and health burden of COPD were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database, World Health Organization, and a recent meta-analysis. COPD risk factor data were obtained from the GBD database.
Results: By 2050, the global direct costs attributable to COPD are projected to be $24.35 trillion cumulatively ($3.89 trillion in 2025). Global indirect costs are estimated to be $15.43 trillion cumulatively by 2050 ($2.50 trillion in 2025), and 15.60 billion COPD exacerbations are projected to occur within that same period (2.28 billion in 2025).
Interpretation: To mitigate the substantial projected economic and health burden of COPD, it is essential to focus on prevention by reducing risk factors such as smoking and air pollution. Additionally, health care policy reforms can improve access to effective treatments, and innovative approaches can enhance patient outcomes.
Keywords: COPD; direct medical costs; economic burden; exacerbations; health burden; indirect costs; projections.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: E. B., A. A., M. B., A. V. B., and L. K. were employees of ResMed during the conduct of this study. M. B. R. reports receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health outside the submitted work. J. A. W. reports receiving grants from GSK, AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Novartis, Chiesi, Genentech, and 37 Clinical and receiving personal fees from Roche, GSK, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Chiesi, Empirico, Epiendo, Pieris, and Pulmatrix outside the submitted work. H. J. Z. is supported by the SA Medical Research Council. A. M. reports receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health; receiving a philanthropic donation from ResMed to the University of California, San Diego; and receiving personal fees from Zoll, Powell Mansfield, Eli Lilly, and Co., and Livanova outside the submitted work. L. E. C. A. reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and California state funding (Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program) outside the submitted work. None declared (M. B. R., S. S., O. O.).
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources