Influence of context on engagement with COVID-19 testing: a scoping review of barriers and facilitators to testing for healthcare workers, care homes and schools in the UK
- PMID: 40254311
- PMCID: PMC12010343
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089062
Influence of context on engagement with COVID-19 testing: a scoping review of barriers and facilitators to testing for healthcare workers, care homes and schools in the UK
Abstract
Objective: The UK government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic included a 'test, trace and isolate' strategy. Testing services for healthcare workers, care homes and schools accounted for the greatest spend and volume of tests. We reviewed relevant literature to identify common and unique barriers and facilitators to engaging with each of these testing services.
Design: Scoping review.
Search strategy: PubMed, Scopus and the WHO COVID-19 Research Database were searched for evidence published between 1 January 2020 and 7 November 2022. This was supplemented by evidence identified via free-text searches on Google Scholar and provided by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
Data extraction and synthesis: Data were extracted by a team of reviewers and synthesised thematically under the broad headings of perceptions, experiences, barriers and facilitators to engaging with the COVID-19 testing programme.
Results: This study included 40 sources, including 17 from projects that informed UKHSA's decisions during the pandemic. Eight themes emerged and were used to categorise barriers and facilitators to engaging with the testing services for healthcare workers, care homes and schools: (1) perceived value, (2) trust in the tests and public bodies, (3) importance of infrastructure, (4) impact of media and social networks, (5) physical burden of the test, (6) perceived capability to undertake testing, (7) importance of relevant information and 8) consequences of testing.
Conclusions: Universal barriers and facilitators to engagement with the testing programme related to the core elements of each testing service, such as uncomfortable specimen collection and the influence of media and peers; these could be mitigated or leveraged to increase engagement across settings. However, the individuals involved, perceptions of value and available resources differed across services, leading to unique experiences between settings. Thus, consideration of context is crucial when designing and implementing a testing programme in response to a pandemic.
Keywords: Behavior; COVID-19; Health Services.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors had financial support from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) for the submitted work; EY LLP London has previously received payment for consultancy and advisory work on the NHS Test & Trace response from the UK Department of Health and Social Care, now known as the UK Health Security Agency. There are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Decision to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid scoping review.BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 29;14(3):e084437. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084437. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38553081 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers' adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD013582. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013582. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32315451 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Performance of antigen lateral flow devices in the UK during the alpha, delta, and omicron waves of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a diagnostic and observational study.Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Aug;23(8):922-932. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00129-9. Epub 2023 Mar 28. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 37001541 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Department of Health and Social Care Coronavirus (COVID-19): scaling up our testing programmes 2020. 2020. [9-Feb-2025]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-scaling-... Available. Accessed.
-
- Vagnoni C, Bunn S. Test, trace and isolate programmes for COVID-19 2020. 2020. [9-Feb-2025]. https://post.parliament.uk/test-trace-and-isolate-programmes-for-covid-19 Available. Accessed.
-
- SAGE Thirty-second SAGE meeting on COVID-19. 2020. [9-Feb-2025]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa... Available. Accessed.
-
- EY-Oxford Health Analytics Consortium Evaluation of the national COVID-19 testing programme in england between October 2020 and March 2022. 2023. [1-Aug-2023]. https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_uk/resources/evalua... Available. Accessed.
-
- Department of Health and Social Care Government launches NHS test and trace service. 2020. [4-Jun-2023]. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-launches-nhs-test-and-trac... Available. Accessed.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical