Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 4:13:1555218.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1555218. eCollection 2025.

Will you accept a virtual human as a friend? Exploring the role of virtual humans in mood management and mental health support

Affiliations

Will you accept a virtual human as a friend? Exploring the role of virtual humans in mood management and mental health support

Doyeon Lee et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: The advancement of virtual human technology has opened new possibilities for its application in various fields, including healthcare. Recent research has begun exploring the use of virtual humans as tools for mood management in daily life. However, there is limited understanding of how individuals perceive virtual humans for this purpose, particularly in social media contexts where they are often viewed as influencers rather than therapeutic entities. This study investigates whether people intend to accept virtual humans as a kind of friend and engage in mood management. The study applies the Cognitive Behavioral Theory of Pathological Internet Use integrated with the Technology Acceptance Model and the Uncanny Valley Effect to explain why people who prefer online social interaction use virtual humans for mood management, and to examine whether they will accept virtual humans as friends.

Methods: This study employs survey, where participants were asked about their perceptions of virtual humans, specifically focusing on their willingness to accept virtual humans as friends for mood management on social media platforms. The sample consists of social media users who are familiar with virtual influencers. A series of hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling to assess the relationships between prefer for online social interaction, online chatting mood regulation, perceived usefulness, ease of use, and intention to accept virtual humans for mood management, as well as the moderating effect of perceived eeriness.

Results: The study found that the preference for online social interaction has a positive impact on using online chatting for mood management, both for casual chatting and therapeutic chatting. Individuals seeking casual chatting perceive usefulness and ease of use for virtual humans, while those seeking therapeutic chatting perceive only usefulness. Perceived usefulness and ease of use have a positive effect on the intention to accept virtual humans as friends. However, perceived eeriness does not have a moderating effect between the variables.

Discussion: The study highlights the potential of virtual humans to assist with mood management on social media platforms, indicating that they could serve a practical role in psychological well-being. While the current study suggests that virtual humans are seen as useful for therapeutic purposes, challenges remain in helping users envision them in this role. Future research should address these challenges by exploring the nuances of user interaction with virtual humans and examining their potential to make a broader social impact, especially in the fields of mental health care and personalized customer service.

Keywords: Technology Acceptance Model; Uncanny Valley Effect; cognitive behavioral theory of PIU; mood management; virtual human.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Research model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Factor loading diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hypotheses verification result.

Similar articles

References

    1. Xygkou A, Siriaraya P, She WJ, Covaci A, Ang CS. “Can I be more social with a Chatbot?”: social connectedness through interactions of autistic adults with a conversational virtual human. Int J Hum Comput Interact. (2024) 40:8937–8954. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2292880 - DOI
    1. Ko J, Lee D. An exploratory study on the influence of perceived characteristics of AI virtual characters on the intention to continue watching news hosted by AI anchor. Korean J Journal Commun Stud. (2023) 67:206–38. doi: 10.20879/kjjcs.2023.67.3.006 - DOI
    1. Carlbring P, Hadjistavropoulos H, Kleiboer A, Andersson G. A new era in internet interventions: the advent of chat-GPT and AI-assisted therapist guidance. Internet Interv. (2023) 32:100621. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100621 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cortés-Pérez I, Osuna-Pérez MC, Montoro-Cárdenas D, Lomas-Vega R, Obrero-Gaitán E, Nieto-Escamez FA. Virtual reality-based therapy improves balance and reduces fear of falling in patients with multiple sclerosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neuroeng Rehabil. (2023) 20:1–18. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01174-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elphinston RA, Vaezipour A, Fowler JA, Russell TG, Sterling M. Psychological therapy using virtual reality for treatment of driving phobia: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. (2023) 45:1582–94. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2069293 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources