Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 2:16:1566925.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1566925. eCollection 2025.

Impact of hepatic steatosis on mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma, end-stage liver disease and HBsAg seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B: a United States cohort study

Affiliations

Impact of hepatic steatosis on mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma, end-stage liver disease and HBsAg seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B: a United States cohort study

George A Yendewa et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Background: Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is prevalent among individuals with chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB), yet its impact on clinical outcomes remains controversial.

Methods: We used electronic health record data from 98 US healthcare-delivery systems to compare adults with (CHB-SLD) and without SLD (CHB-wo-SLD) from 2000 to 2024. We applied 1: 1 propensity score matching to balance cohorts by demographic and clinical characteristics. We further performed sensitivity analyses in the presence or absence of cirrhosis. We compared incidence rates (IR) and hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), end-stage liver disease (ESLD) events, and detectable HBsAg and HBeAg as markers of seroclearance.

Results: Among 124,932 individuals with CHB (12.43% CHB-SLD), there were 470,707 person-years of observations (median follow-up 2.95 years). Compared with CHB, individuals with CHB-SLD had a lower mortality risk (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.40-0.48). Fibrosis risk was higher among those with CHB-SLD (vs CHB-wo-SLD) (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.71-2.19); however, cirrhosis risk was comparable (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.96-1.18) between cohorts, while HCC risk was lower in the CHB-SLD cohort (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.96). The CHB-SLD cohort also had significantly reduced risks of ESLD events, including ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome (all p < 0.001). Additionally, detectable HBsAg and HBeAg IRs and HRs were lower among CHB-SLD compared to the CHB-wo-SLD cohort: 26.83 vs. 31.96 per 1,000 person-years (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.87) and 8.52 vs. 11.36 per 1,000 person-years (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.85), respectively. Sensitivity analyses stratified by cirrhosis status supported these findings.

Conclusion: CHB-SLD status was associated with more favorable outcomes, highlighting the complexity of CHB and SLD interactions.

Keywords: cirrhosis; end-stage liver disease; fibrosis; hepatitis B virus; hepatocellular carcinoma; mortality; steatotic liver disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of survival probabilities of outcomes between CHB-SLD and CHB-wo-SLD (a) Mortality (b) Fibrosis (c) Cirrhosis (d) Hepatocellular carcinoma Footnote: CHB-SLD, patients with chronic hepatitis B and steatotic liver disease; CHB-wo-SLD, patients with chronic hepatitis B without steatotic liver disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of event probabilities of virologic outcomes between CHB-SLD and CHB-wo-SLD (a) HBsAg seroclearance (b) HBeAg seroclearance Footnote: CHB-SLD, patients with chronic hepatitis B and steatotic liver disease; CHB-wo-SLD, patients with chronic hepatitis B without steatotic liver disease; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen.

Similar articles

References

    1. Yip TC, Wong VW, Wong GL. Does hepatic steatosis impact chronic hepatitis B? Hepatology. (2023) 77:1478–81. doi: 10.1002/hep.32803 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang J, Lin S, Jiang D, Li M, Chen Y, Li J, et al. . Chronic hepatitis B and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Conspirators or competitors? Liver Int. (2020) 40:496–508. doi: 10.1111/liv.14369 - DOI - PubMed
    1. MaChado MV, Oliveira AG, Cortez-Pinto H. Hepatic steatosis in hepatitis B virus infected patients: meta-analysis of risk factors and comparison with hepatitis C infected patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2011) 26:1361–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06801.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou R, Yang L, Zhang B, Gu Y, Kong T, Zhang W, et al. . Clinical impact of hepatic steatosis on chronic hepatitis B patients in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Viral Hepat. (2023) 30(10):793–802. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13872 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jiang D, Chen C, Liu X, Huang C, Yan D, Zhang X, et al. . Concurrence and impact of hepatic steatosis on chronic hepatitis B patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med. (2021) 9:1718. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-3052 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources