Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 4:12:1564549.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1564549. eCollection 2025.

Dietary index for gut microbiota and its inverse association with female infertility: evidence from NHANES 2013-2018

Affiliations

Dietary index for gut microbiota and its inverse association with female infertility: evidence from NHANES 2013-2018

Chiqiang Cheng et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

Background: Infertility has become a global health concern, especially as the aging population continues to grow. Previous studies suggest that gut microbiota plays a crucial role in female reproductive health. This study aimed to investigate the association between the Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota (DI-GM) and female infertility.

Methods: We analyzed data from 8,910 participants aged 20-45 years in the NHANES 2013-2018 cycles. DI-GM scores were calculated based on dietary recall interviews, including 14 foods and nutrients associated with gut health. Female infertility was identified through reproductive health questionnaires. Weighted logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between DI-GM and infertility, with adjustments for demographic, lifestyle, and health-related covariates. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses explored non-linear associations, and subgroup analyses ensured the robustness of the results.

Results: A significant negative association was observed between DI-GM and female infertility (adjusted OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.95, p < 0.001). Participants with DI-GM scores ≥6 had a 40% lower risk of infertility compared to those with scores 0-3 (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44-0.82, p = 0.001). RCS analyses revealed an L-shaped non-linear relationship, with a threshold at DI-GM = 5. Subgroup analyses indicated stronger associations in women with lower education levels and those with coronary heart disease (P for interaction <0.05).

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that a higher DI-GM score is associated with a reduced risk of female infertility, suggesting that dietary interventions targeting gut microbiota may offer a cost-effective strategy for improving reproductive health. Further longitudinal and interventional studies are warranted to confirm causality and elucidate underlying mechanisms.

Keywords: DI-GM; NHANES; dietary; dietary index for gut microbiota; infertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the sample selection from NHANES 2013–2018.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The dose-effect relationship between DI-GM and female infertility. Age, race, education level, marital status, PIR, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, diabetes, hypertension, CVD, stroke, pelvic infection/PID, regular menstrual periods, history of hysterectomy, history of bilateral oophorectomy, female hormones taken, and birth control pills taken were adjusted.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Subgroup analysis of the association between DI-GM and female infertility. The above model was adjusted for age, race, education level, marital status, PIR, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, diabetes, hypertension, CVD, stroke, pelvic infection/PID, regular menstrual periods, history of hysterectomy, history of bilateral oophorectomy, female hormones taken, and birth control pills taken. In each case, the model was not adjusted for the stratification variable.

Similar articles

References

    1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. . International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. (2009) 92:1520–4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Homan GF, Davies M, Norman R. The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: a review. Hum Reprod Update. (2007) 13:209–23. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml056, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine . Effectiveness and treatment for unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. (2006) 86:S111–4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1475 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Lederman A, Gibbons W, Schattman GL, et al. . Cumulative birth rates with linked assisted reproductive technology cycles. N Engl J Med. (2012) 366:2483–91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110238, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evers JL. Female subfertility. Lancet. (2002) 360:151–9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09417-5, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources