Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 18;13(4):e6709.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006709. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Patient-Surgeon Satisfaction Discrepancy following Breast Reduction Surgery: A 10-year Analysis of Aesthetic Outcomes and Quality of Life

Affiliations

Patient-Surgeon Satisfaction Discrepancy following Breast Reduction Surgery: A 10-year Analysis of Aesthetic Outcomes and Quality of Life

Adriano Fabi et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Background: Breast reduction surgery has been recognized for its potential to improve quality of life in patients with macromastia or after unilateral oncological treatment. However, comparative analysis of different surgical techniques remains sparse. Patient-reported outcome measures have emerged as indispensable tools in assessing patient satisfaction and postoperative outcomes. Driven by the hypothesis of substantial differences between self-reported patient outcomes and professional assessments, this study aimed to compare different technical approaches, integrating both the patients' and plastic surgeons' perspectives.

Methods: A 10-year retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted to compare patient- and surgeon-reported outcomes using pre- and postoperative BREAST-Q questionnaires and aesthetic self-assessments. Outcomes and postoperative complication rates of different technical approaches were analyzed using photographic documentation.

Results: A total of 170 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 92 agreed to further photographic documentation for aesthetic evaluation. The median follow-up duration was 4.9 years. BREAST-Q scores significantly improved across all surgical techniques, with comparable scores in both oncoplastic and nononcoplastic patients. Notably, patients reported greater satisfaction with the postoperative aesthetic outcomes than surgeons. Multivariable analysis confirmed body mass index as a significant risk factor for postoperative complications.

Conclusions: Breast reduction surgery improves both aesthetic outcomes and long-term quality of life, regardless of surgical technique or the use of oncoplastic methods. The discrepancy between patient and surgeon satisfaction highlights the need for a patient-centered approach, such as incorporating patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate postoperative results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. This study was funded by the Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland, as well as the Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft Basel (FAG), Switzerland.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Pre- and postoperative results of the BREAST-Q scores (n = 48).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Comparison of aesthetic evaluations by patients (n = 48) vs surgeons (n = 92).

References

    1. Gonzalez F, Walton RL, Shafer B, et al. . Reduction mammaplasty improves symptoms of macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91:1270–1276. - PubMed
    1. Collins ED, Kerrigan CL, Kim M, et al. . The effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical interventions in relieving the symptoms of macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:1556–1566. - PubMed
    1. Coriddi M, Nadeau M, Taghizadeh M, et al. . Analysis of satisfaction and well-being following breast reduction using a validated survey instrument: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:285–290. - PubMed
    1. Jørgensen MG, Albertsdottir E, Dalaei F, et al. . Age and body mass index affect patient satisfaction following reduction mammoplasty: a multicenter study using BREAST-Q. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41:NP336–NP345. - PubMed
    1. Hall-Findlay EJ, Shestak KC. Breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:531e–544e. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources