Patient-Surgeon Satisfaction Discrepancy following Breast Reduction Surgery: A 10-year Analysis of Aesthetic Outcomes and Quality of Life
- PMID: 40256347
- PMCID: PMC12007868
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006709
Patient-Surgeon Satisfaction Discrepancy following Breast Reduction Surgery: A 10-year Analysis of Aesthetic Outcomes and Quality of Life
Abstract
Background: Breast reduction surgery has been recognized for its potential to improve quality of life in patients with macromastia or after unilateral oncological treatment. However, comparative analysis of different surgical techniques remains sparse. Patient-reported outcome measures have emerged as indispensable tools in assessing patient satisfaction and postoperative outcomes. Driven by the hypothesis of substantial differences between self-reported patient outcomes and professional assessments, this study aimed to compare different technical approaches, integrating both the patients' and plastic surgeons' perspectives.
Methods: A 10-year retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted to compare patient- and surgeon-reported outcomes using pre- and postoperative BREAST-Q questionnaires and aesthetic self-assessments. Outcomes and postoperative complication rates of different technical approaches were analyzed using photographic documentation.
Results: A total of 170 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 92 agreed to further photographic documentation for aesthetic evaluation. The median follow-up duration was 4.9 years. BREAST-Q scores significantly improved across all surgical techniques, with comparable scores in both oncoplastic and nononcoplastic patients. Notably, patients reported greater satisfaction with the postoperative aesthetic outcomes than surgeons. Multivariable analysis confirmed body mass index as a significant risk factor for postoperative complications.
Conclusions: Breast reduction surgery improves both aesthetic outcomes and long-term quality of life, regardless of surgical technique or the use of oncoplastic methods. The discrepancy between patient and surgeon satisfaction highlights the need for a patient-centered approach, such as incorporating patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate postoperative results.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. This study was funded by the Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland, as well as the Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft Basel (FAG), Switzerland.
Figures
References
-
- Gonzalez F, Walton RL, Shafer B, et al. . Reduction mammaplasty improves symptoms of macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91:1270–1276. - PubMed
-
- Collins ED, Kerrigan CL, Kim M, et al. . The effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical interventions in relieving the symptoms of macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:1556–1566. - PubMed
-
- Coriddi M, Nadeau M, Taghizadeh M, et al. . Analysis of satisfaction and well-being following breast reduction using a validated survey instrument: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:285–290. - PubMed
-
- Jørgensen MG, Albertsdottir E, Dalaei F, et al. . Age and body mass index affect patient satisfaction following reduction mammoplasty: a multicenter study using BREAST-Q. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41:NP336–NP345. - PubMed
-
- Hall-Findlay EJ, Shestak KC. Breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:531e–544e. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous