Risk Factors Associated With Revision Microdiscectomy or Subsequent Spinal Fusion Within Two Years of Index Lumbar Microdiscectomy
- PMID: 40257171
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005302
Risk Factors Associated With Revision Microdiscectomy or Subsequent Spinal Fusion Within Two Years of Index Lumbar Microdiscectomy
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective review of insurance claims and electronic medical records of a major blended health organization in the eastern United States.
Objective: Primary objective was to report rates of revision microdiscectomy and fusion within two years of index lumbar microdiscectomy. Secondary objectives were to identify patient characteristics and comorbidities predictive for revision surgeries.
Summary of background information: Incidence of disc reherniation after lumbar microdiscectomy ranges from 3% to 18%. Although rates of revision microdiscectomy are well reported, rates of fusion after index microdiscectomy and risk factors for subsequent fusion beyond history of prior discectomy warrants further investigation.
Methods: Retrospective review of health insurance claims data for index lumbar microdiscectomy between January 2016, and December 2019. Rates of revision microdiscectomy and fusion within two years were reported, and cohort demographics and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) comorbidities were analyzed using Pearson χ 2 analyses and Fisher exact tests. Time-to-event modeling and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression assessed for predictors of revision surgery.
Results: The full sample consisted of 8158 members. The rate of revision microdiscectomy was 3.5% within one year and 5.5% within two years of index surgery. The rate of fusion was 2.9% within one year and 6.6% within two years of index surgery. Age 40 to 59 ( P <0.001), female sex ( P =0.024), and presence of ≥1 CCI comorbidities ( P <0.001) were significantly associated with time-to-fusion but not revision microdiscectomy. Increasing CCI score was associated with a significantly greater likelihood of need for fusion (CCI=1, HR 1.35, P =0.045; CCI=2, HR 1.85, P <0.001; CCI ≥ 3, HR 2.47, P <0.001).
Conclusion: Rates of revision microdiscectomy and fusion within two years of index lumbar microdiscectomy were 5.5% and 6.6%, respectively. Age 40 to 59 years, female sex, and having ≥1 CCI comorbidity, were significantly predictive of time-to-fusion but not revision microdiscectomy. Having at least one comorbidity increased the likelihood of fusion by 80%.
Keywords: Charlson comorbidity index; claims; fusion; microdiscectomy; recurrent disc herniation; reoperation; revision; spinal fusion.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniationthe spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA. 2006;296:2451–2459.
-
- Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, et al. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine. 2005;30:927–935.
-
- Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson ANA, et al. Surgical versus non-operative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: eight-year results for the spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT). Spine. 2014;39:3–16.
-
- McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GLG, Datoo G, et al. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:338–344.
-
- Huang W, Han Z, Liu J, et al. Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016;95:e2378.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
