Fast 4D-PET parametric imaging computation at the whole field of view level: Reliability under simulated conditions of PET KinetiX, a dedicated software solution
- PMID: 40257613
- DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07285-0
Fast 4D-PET parametric imaging computation at the whole field of view level: Reliability under simulated conditions of PET KinetiX, a dedicated software solution
Abstract
Purpose: The reliability of a new academic software, PET KinetiX, designed for fast parametric 4D-PET imaging computation, is assessed under simulated conditions.
Methods: 4D-PET data were simulated using the XCAT digital phantom and realistic time-activity curves (ground truth). Four hundred analytical simulations were reconstructed using CASToR, an open-source software for tomographic reconstruction, replicating the clinical characteristics of two available PET systems with short and long axial fields of view (SAFOV and LAFOV). A total of 2,800 Patlak and 2TCM kinetic parametric maps of 18F-FDG were generated using PET KinetiX. The mean biases and standard deviations of the kinetic parametric maps were computed for each tissue label and compared to the biases of unprocessed SUV data. Additionally, the mean absolute ratio of kinetic-to-SUV contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was estimated for each tissue structure, along with the corresponding standard deviations.
Results: The Ki and vb parametric maps produced by PET KinetiX faithfully reproduced the predefined multi-tissue structures of the XCAT digital phantom for both Patlak and 2TCM models. Image definition was influenced by the 4D-PET input data: a higher number of iterations resulted in sharper rendering and higher standard deviations in PET signal characteristics. Biases relative to the ground truth varied across tissue structures and hardware configurations, similarly to unprocessed SUV data. In most tissue structures, Patlak kinetic-to-SUV CNR ratios exceeded 1 for both SAFOV and LAFOV configurations. The highest kinetic-to-SUV CNR ratio was observed in 2TCM k₃ maps within tumor regions.
Conclusion: PET KinetiX currently generates Ki and vb parametric maps that are qualitatively comparable to unprocessed SUV data, with improved CNR in most cases. The 2TCM k₃ parametric maps for tumor structures exhibited the highest CNR enhancement, warranting further evaluation across different anatomical regions and radiotracer applications.
Keywords: Digital phantom; Kinetic modeling; PET; Parametric imaging; Quantification; Simulation.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval: This simulation study did not require ethical approval. Competing interests: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Impact of different parametric Patlak imaging approaches and comparison with a 2-tissue compartment pharmacokinetic model with a long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT in oncological patients.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Jan;52(2):623-637. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06879-4. Epub 2024 Sep 11. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025. PMID: 39256215 Free PMC article.
-
PET KinetiX-A Software Solution for PET Parametric Imaging at the Whole Field of View Level.J Imaging Inform Med. 2024 Apr;37(2):842-850. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00965-z. Epub 2024 Jan 10. J Imaging Inform Med. 2024. PMID: 38343229 Free PMC article.
-
Whole-body direct 4D parametric PET imaging employing nested generalized Patlak expectation-maximization reconstruction.Phys Med Biol. 2016 Aug 7;61(15):5456-85. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/15/5456. Epub 2016 Jul 6. Phys Med Biol. 2016. PMID: 27383991 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative Analysis of Heterogeneous [18F]FDG Static (SUV) vs. Patlak (Ki) Whole-body PET Imaging Using Different Segmentation Methods: a Simulation Study.Mol Imaging Biol. 2019 Apr;21(2):317-327. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1241-8. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019. PMID: 29956119
-
Dynamic whole-body PET imaging: principles, potentials and applications.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Feb;46(2):501-518. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4153-6. Epub 2018 Sep 29. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30269154 Review.
References
-
- Lindsay MJ, Siegel BA, Tunis SR, Hillner BE, Shields AF, Carey BP, et al. The National Oncologic PET Registry: expanded medicare coverage for PET under coverage with evidence development. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1109–13. - PubMed
-
- Besson FL, Nocturne G, Noël N, Gheysens O, Slart RHJA, Glaudemans AWJM. PET/CT in Inflammatory and Auto-immune Disorders: Focus on Several Key Molecular Concepts, FDG, and Radiolabeled Probe Perspectives. Semin Nucl Med. 2024;54:379–93. - PubMed
-
- Hope TA, Allen-Auerbach M, Bodei L, Calais J, Dahlbom M, Dunnwald LK, et al. SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for SSTR PET: Imaging Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:204–10. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources