The cost of implementing and sustaining an evidence-based, behavioral-health electronic screening system in probation departments
- PMID: 40257699
- PMCID: PMC12010558
- DOI: 10.1186/s40352-024-00312-6
The cost of implementing and sustaining an evidence-based, behavioral-health electronic screening system in probation departments
Erratum in
-
Correction: The cost of implementing and sustaining an evidence‑based, behavioral‑health electronic screening system in probation departments.Health Justice. 2025 May 21;13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40352-025-00339-3. Health Justice. 2025. PMID: 40397324 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Roughly 50%-75% of youths who have had contact with the juvenile justice system have a mental-health disorder. In 2019, a northeastern state required probation departments to implement an evidence-based behavioral health (BH) screen. e-Connect is a digital clinical decisional support system designed to identify suicide thoughts and behaviors and related BH risk and triage youths based on BH need, then facilitate linkage to care.
Objective: To identify the resources and estimate the costs required to implement and sustain e-Connect from probation-department and policymaker perspectives.
Methods: Prospective micro-costing analysis conducted concurrently with a rigorous evaluation of e-Connect. Data were collected for 622 youths ages 10-18 via administrative records, study instruments, and semi-structured interviews. Resources/costs were categorized as "fixed", "time-dependent", or "variable". Mean annual costs (per-county and per-screen, by county) were calculated for two intervention phases, "implementation" and "sustainment". All costs are in 2019 USD.
Results: The policymaker-relevant, annualized, mean, per-county start-up and sustainment costs were $18,704 (SD = $14,320) and $13,374 (SD = $13,317), respectively. The per-screen sustainment cost was $115 (SD = $113) across counties, with variation attributed to a combination of a county's behavioral-health needs, and differences in the types of resources utilized as part of their post-screening clinical response.
Conclusion: The results of this analysis will inform the decisions of probation departments and their stakeholders, who are interested in implementing an evidence-based behavioral-health screen for youths on probation. Site-level figures will provide important details regarding the resources/costs associated with various implementation and management strategies. Cross-site, per-person averages will provide crucial inputs into budget impact models and cost-effectiveness analyses.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: No competing interests to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Abram, K. M., Teplin, L. A., King, D. C., Longworth, S. L., Emanuel, K. M., Romero, E. G., & Olson, N. D. (2013). PTSD, trauma, and comorbid psychiatric disorders in detained youth. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, p. 3–9.
-
- Administration, S. A. a. M. H. S. (2021). About Criminal and Juvenile Justice. Web Page. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/criminal-juvenile-justice/about
-
- Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook Web Page. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes211092.htm
-
- Bureau of Transportation Statistics, United States Department of Transportation Web Page. Retrieved from https://transtats.bts.gov/AIRFARES/
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015). Rates of Mental and BehavioralHealth Service Providers by County.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
