Team based learning pedagogy enhances the education quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 40259292
- PMCID: PMC12010525
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-07175-x
Team based learning pedagogy enhances the education quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: In medical education, Lecture Based Learning (LBL) is the most common way of disseminating information. Team Based Learning (TBL), a new teaching method, is a teacher-guided method that employs teams in a class, showing suitability for medical education. Two teaching methods represent distinct educational approaches, each with its own set of advantages and limitations. In this study, we performed a systemic review on the efficacy of TBL pedagogy in medical education.
Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database were searched through July 2022. Standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Results: The analysis included 33 studies. Our analysis revealed that students utilizing the TBL method exhibited significantly higher pre-( SMD = 0.51, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.92) /post-test (SMD = 0.96, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.22) scores than students with LBL. Students in TBL classes had better development of scores, retention (SMD = 1.03, 95%CI 0.38 to 1.69), engagement (SMD = 2.26, 95%CI 0.23 to 4.29) and higher satisfactory rate (SMD = 1.08, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.29). However, students required more time to independently complete reading materials and preparatory tasks.
Conclusion: Our study indicates the gratifying effectiveness of TBL application in medical education. TBL pedagogy is compatible with the present medical education and should be generalized in more classrooms.
Keywords: Lecture based learning; Medical education; Meta-analysis; Team based learning.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical approval: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Michaelsen LK, Fink LD. Designing effective group activities: lessons for classroom teaching and faculty development. Prof Organizational Dev Netw High Educ. 1997;16:385.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- No. 82271151/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- No. 82472554/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- No. 21CGA14/Shanghai ChenGuang Program
- SHDC12023104/Project of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center
- No. JYYQ006/Fund for Excellent Young Scholars of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
