Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 22:19:e100.
doi: 10.1017/dmp.2025.100.

Adaptive Health Systems: Innovations in Crisis Management During Armed Conflicts

Affiliations

Adaptive Health Systems: Innovations in Crisis Management During Armed Conflicts

Maryam Jafar Sameri et al. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. .

Abstract

Objective: Armed conflicts cause substantial disruptions to health care systems, necessitating innovative approaches to crisis management. Systematic reviews play a critical role in evaluating adaptive health innovations implemented during such conflicts, shedding light on their impact on crisis management and health outcomes within affected communities.

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science resulted in 5432 articles. The review covered studies published since 2000 that addressed crisis management innovations. A rigorous selection process based on PICO criteria was employed to include relevant high-quality studies.

Results: Following screening, 21 studies were identified, demonstrating considerable innovation in health systems in conflict-affected regions. The key innovations were decentralized management structures, community health worker programs, and mobile health units, all aimed at enhancing service delivery under difficult circumstances. In spite of this, persistent challenges like infrastructure destruction, limited resources, and security risks remain substantial obstacles to the availability of health care.

Discussion: Findings highlight the critical role played by resilient health systems in mitigating the negative effects related to armed conflicts. While some innovations are promising, problems like resource constraints, infrastructure destruction, and data collection challenges remain unresolved. The review's strengths lie in its systematic nature and extensive coverage of the literature, while potential publication bias and language restrictions should be acknowledged as limitations.

Conclusions: The present review highlights the key role of adaptive health responses in crisis management and demands more research on their long-term effects and scalability. Future research must examine comparisons across a number of nations and utilize technology, including telemedicine and digital platforms, to strengthen health care resilience in areas impacted by conflict.

Keywords: adaptive health systems; armed conflicts; crisis management; health innovations; health systems in war.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources