Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 21;13(2):qfaf023.
doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfaf023. eCollection 2025 Apr.

AI-assisted transcription of YouTube videos on penile enlargement: analysis of their text quality and readability

Affiliations

AI-assisted transcription of YouTube videos on penile enlargement: analysis of their text quality and readability

Mehmet Fatih Şahin et al. Sex Med. .

Abstract

Background: Patients dealing with sensitive issues like penile enlargement (PE) might benefit from YouTube videos. Therefore, it is essential that the textual content of these videos is clear, trustworthy, and of high quality.

Aim: Are the AI-assisted acquired texts' qualities and comprehensibilities of YouTube videos about PE enough and suitable for the patients?

Methods: On October 25, 2024, Google Trends analysis identified the 25 most searched phrases for "Penile enlargement." Non-related terms were excluded, and the relevant keywords were searched on YouTube. Only content about PE included; excluding duplicates, non-English videos, YouTube shorts, those under 30 seconds, silent, and music-only videos. Videos were transcribed using Whisper AI, and their quality was assessed by M.F.Ş, E.C.T., and Ç.D. using the GQS (global quality scale) and DISCERN, the readability was evaluated via Flesch-Kincaid (FKGL and FKRE) measures. High assessor agreement was noted (Pearson r = 0.912). Videos were categorized by uploader, and metrics such as views, likes, comments, and duration were recorded. The Chi-square test was used for categorical variable comparisons; the Kruskal-Wallis H-Test was applied when normality and homoscedasticity were not met, with Bonferroni post hoc correction for multiple comparisons.

Outcomes: The mean DISCERN and GQS scores were 51.23 ± 13.1 and 3.32 ± 0.9, respectively. FKRE and FKGL scores were 73.12 ± 11.7 and 5.85 ± 2.1. Physicians (n = 67) produced the most videos, while academic institutions (n = 2) produced the least. No significant differences in text quality were found between groups (P = 0.067 and P = 0.051). Health-related websites exhibited lower FKRE compared to non-healthcare videos (P = 0.002), with a significant difference in FKGL as well (P = 0.019).

Results: The video exhibited a high level of readability (indicating comprehensibility for almost a 6th-grade student). Text quality, view and like count of the videos uploaded by academic institutions was the highest.

Clinical implications: In PE, YouTube video's health information needs to be better quality and more trustworthy, according to our research. The language used in videos should be easier to understand.

Strengths and limitations: This study is the first scientific analysis of YouTube video transcripts on PE using AI, focusing specifically on English content, which limits its applicability to non-English speakers and other platforms. Exclusions of silent and shorter videos may result in the omission of valuable information.

Conclusion: The need for better quality and trustworthiness in health-related YouTube information, especially for PE is essential. Content makers should stress clear, accessible language and minimize disinformation.

Keywords: YouTube; artificial intelligence; penile enlargement; transcription; whisperAI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors received any type of financial support that could be considered potential conflict of interest regarding the manuscript or its submission.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Top five keywords about PE.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Çağlayan A, Gül M. #Penisenlargement on Instagram: a mixed-methods study. Int J Impot Res. 2024;36(3):218–222. 10.1038/s41443-022-00646-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Littara A, Melone R, Morales-Medina JC, Iannitti T, Palmieri B. Cosmetic penile enhancement surgery: a 3-year single-centre retrospective clinical evaluation of 355 cases. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6323. 10.1038/s41598-019-41652-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Romero-Otero J, Manfredi C, Ralph D, et al. Non-invasive and surgical penile enhancement interventions for aesthetic or therapeutic purposes: a systematic review. BJU Int. 2021;127(3):269–291. 10.1111/bju.15145 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Savoie M, Kim SS, Soloway MS. A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003;169(4):1462–1464. 10.1097/01.ju.0000053720.93303.33 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82469. 10.1371/journal.pone.0082469 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources