The use of left ventricular ejection fraction in the diagnosis and management of heart failure. A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC, the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), and the Japanese Heart Failure Society (JHFS)
- PMID: 40260636
- DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3646
The use of left ventricular ejection fraction in the diagnosis and management of heart failure. A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC, the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), and the Japanese Heart Failure Society (JHFS)
Abstract
This clinical consensus statement revisits the role of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a measurement of cardiac function, a prognostic marker and a major criterion to classify patients with heart failure, and gives new advice for clinical practice. Heart failure is traditionally classified on the basis of LVEF thresholds and this has major implications for treatment recommendations. However, the reproducibility of LVEF measurement is poor and its prognostic and diagnostic value lessens when it is above 45%, with no relationship with the severity of either cardiac dysfunction or outcomes at higher values. These limitations dictate the need for a more comprehensive approach to classify and assess heart failure focusing more on the trajectory of LVEF rather than to its absolute value. Furthermore, the assessment of LVEF is not required for the initiation of treatments like sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and diuretics in patients with suspected de novo heart failure and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Future research utilizing advanced imaging techniques and biomarkers which can better characterize myocardial structure, metabolism and performance may facilitate the identification of alternative therapeutic targets and better ways to monitor heart failure therapies across the entire spectrum of LVEF.
Keywords: Diagnosis; Heart failure; Left ventricular ejection fraction; Management; Phenotypes.
© 2025 European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Japanese Heart Failure Society.
References
-
- MacKenzie J. Principles of Diagnosis and Treatment in Heart Affections. London: Henry Frowde and Hodder & Stoughton; 1918.
-
- Konstam MA, Abboud FM. Ejection fraction: Misunderstood and overrated (changing the paradigm in categorizing heart failure). Circulation 2017;135:717–719. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025795
-
- Bozkurt B, Coats AJ, Tsutsui H, Abdelhamid CM, Adamopoulos S, Albert N, et al. Universal definition and classification of heart failure: A report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure. J Card Fail 2021;27:387–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.01.022
-
- Cohn JN, Johnson G, Ziesche S, Cobb F, Francis G, Tristani F, et al. A comparison of enalapril with hydralazine‐isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1991;325:303–310. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199108013250502
-
- CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). N Engl J Med 1987;316:1429–1435. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198706043162301
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical