Evaluating the return of additional findings from the 100,000 Genomes Project: A mixed-methods study exploring participant experiences of receiving secondary findings from genomic sequencing
- PMID: 40260669
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2025.101446
Evaluating the return of additional findings from the 100,000 Genomes Project: A mixed-methods study exploring participant experiences of receiving secondary findings from genomic sequencing
Abstract
Purpose: The 100,000 Genomes Project participants could consent to receive additional findings (AFs) for variants associated with susceptibility to cancer and familial hypercholesterolemia. Here, we evaluate stakeholder experiences to inform clinical practice.
Methods: Mixed-methods study conducted at 18 sites across England that comprised a cross-sectional survey and interviews with participants who received a positive AF (PAF) and interviews with participants who had no AFs (NAF).
Results: There were 146 surveys followed by 35 interviews with PAF participants and 29 interviews with NAF participants. Surveys found that PAF results were seen as useful and would influence health management (82%). Most (90%) had shared their result with family members. Experiences differed by PAF type; cancer PAF participants were often initially shocked and anxious and found telling family members challenging compared with participants with a familial hypercholesterolemia PAF. Although most experiences of NAF results were positive, some misunderstandings were identified. Participants supported returning AFs when offering genome sequencing.
Conclusion: Patient experiences of receiving AFs were primarily positive, and there is support for offering AFs routinely. Considerations for offering AFs in clinical practice include adapting approaches tailored to individual conditions and greater support for people with a NAF result.
Keywords: Additional findings; Experiences; Genome sequencing; Psychosocial; Secondary findings.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
