Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Sep;50(5):831-839.
doi: 10.1111/coa.14317. Epub 2025 Apr 22.

Circulating Tumour DNA as a Complementary Tool for Treatment Evaluation in HPV-Associated Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Observational Cohort Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Circulating Tumour DNA as a Complementary Tool for Treatment Evaluation in HPV-Associated Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Observational Cohort Study

Anna Oldaeus Almerén et al. Clin Otolaryngol. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP) are increasing. Despite good prognosis, recurrence rates range from 10% to 25%. Surveillance with clinical controls and imaging is not always reliable. Circulating tumour human papillomavirus DNA (ctHPV-DNA) has emerged as a potential biomarker for treatment evaluation and detection of recurrence. We aimed to investigate the correlation between ctHPV-DNA in HPV+ OPSCC/HNCUP and radiologic tumour burden. Additionally, we sought to assess whether ctHPV-DNA could serve as a tool in treatment evaluation.

Design: A prospective observational cohort study.

Setting: This multicenter study involved three otolaryngology units located in central Sweden. We utilised HPV genotype-specific assays for droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to detect ctHPV-DNA in plasma at diagnosis and follow-up. ctHPV-DNA levels were correlated to radiological tumour burden and radiological response using the Kendall Rank correlation coefficient and the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Participants: Patients with HPV+ OPSCC/HNCUP undergoing definitive (chemo)radiotherapy and enrolled in the CIRCOS study.

Results: Out of 54 patients, 51 were eligible for analyses. At baseline, ctHPV-DNA was detectable in 88%. A majority of patients with a favourable radiological evaluation according to RECIST had a corresponding undetectable ctHPV-DNA at follow-up. The levels of ctHPV-DNA at baseline correlated with total tumour volume and nodal volume (rτ = 0.39, p < 0.01, respectively rτ = 0.26, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: ctHPV-DNA shows correlation with tumour burden. This study strengthens the role of ctHPV-DNA as a promising biomarker for treatment evaluation in HPV-related OPC/HNCUP. With further research on serial plasma sampling, ctHPV-DNA could complement radiological treatment evaluation in HPV+ OPSCC/HNCUP.

Trial registration: NCT05904327 [ClinicalTrials.gov].

Keywords: RECIST; biomarker; cancer of unknown primary; ctHPV‐DNA; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; human papilloma virus; oropharyngeal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Presentation of available data at the different time‐points. The cohort consists of the patients enrolled between December 2020 and June 2022.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Diagram showing the correlation between ctHPV‐DNA (copies/mL) at baseline and radiological volumetric measurements on images from diagnostic CT. (A) The correlation between ctHPV‐DNA and diameter of target lesions (mm). (B) The correlation between ctHPV‐DNA and total tumour volume (cm3). Kendall rank correlation coefficient was applied for calculation of correlations. The short axis of the lymph nodes was used for diameter estimations in nodal lesions (mm), while the longest diameter (mm) was applied for the primary tumour lesions (n = 51).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Treatment evaluation. (A) Comparison of baseline values of ctHPV‐DNA depending on RECIST evaluation. (B) Comparison between molecular response measured in percentage change in ctHPV‐DNA from baseline to the follow‐up sample taken at close proximity to radiological evaluation, and RECIST results. The Y‐axis has been modified to enhance interpretability. Kruskal–Wallis. n = 47. CR = complete response, PD = progressive response, PR = partial response.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lechner M., Liu J., Masterson L., and Fenton T. R., “HPV‐Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer: Epidemiology, Molecular Biology and Clinical Management,” Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology 19, no. 5 (2022): 306–327. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zamani M., Grønhøj C., Jensen D. H., et al., “The Current Epidemic of HPV‐Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer: An 18‐Year Danish Population‐Based Study With 2,169 Patients,” European Journal of Cancer 134 (2020): 52–59. - PubMed
    1. Garset‐Zamani M., Carlander A. F., Jakobsen K. K., et al., “Impact of Specific High‐Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotypes on Survival in Oropharyngeal Cancer,” International Journal of Cancer 150, no. 7 (2022): 1174–1183. - PubMed
    1. Mehanna H., Taberna M., von Buchwald C., et al., “Prognostic Implications of p16 and HPV Discordance in Oropharyngeal Cancer (HNCIG‐EPIC‐OPC): A Multicentre, Multinational, Individual Patient Data Analysis,” Lancet Oncology 24, no. 3 (2023): 239–251. - PubMed
    1. Ang K. K., Harris J., Wheeler R., et al., “Human Papillomavirus and Survival of Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine 363, no. 1 (2010): 24–35. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data