Radiation protection: safety measures and knowledge among interventional radiologists- a UK-based analysis of current practices and recommendations for improvement
- PMID: 40261505
- PMCID: PMC12014967
- DOI: 10.1186/s42155-025-00540-3
Radiation protection: safety measures and knowledge among interventional radiologists- a UK-based analysis of current practices and recommendations for improvement
Abstract
• Lack of Evidence-Based Practice: There is a significant gap in evidence-based practices related to radiation protection. Our understanding of global standards and practices, as well as their long-term impact on operator health, remains limited. Standardising current procedures and establishing a uniform database for data entry by all practitioners performing X-ray-based procedures would be beneficial.
• Lack of tailored measures to enhance protection for Female Operators: Female operators are at a greater risk of radiation exposure (Front Genet 10:260, 2019), underscoring the need for comprehensive guidance and standards to mitigate both short—and long-term health risks. Research and higher-level evidence are essential to evaluate the efficacy of current practices, along with better access to tools for accurate fetal dose calculation when needed.
• Balancing Protection and Ergonomics: It is crucial to achieve the right balance between adequate lead protection and ergonomic considerations for the spine and musculoskeletal system. The minimum level of lead protection scientifically required to ensure operator safety without compromising comfort and posture must be determined.
• Lack of accurate data regarding the log of health issues for personnel working with radiation gears. A national or international anonymised registry would be ideal for capturing and monitoring such data.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42155-025-00540-3.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: For this type of study, no ethical approval or formal consent is required. No animal studies were performed. Consent for publication: For this type of study, consent for publication is not required. Competing interests: None declared.
Figures













Similar articles
-
Summary of the Italian inter-society recommendations for radiation protection optimization in interventional radiology.Radiol Med. 2018 May;123(5):378-384. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0849-0. Epub 2018 Jan 6. Radiol Med. 2018. PMID: 29307078
-
Occupational Radiation Exposure during Pregnancy: A Survey of Attitudes and Practices among Interventional Radiologists.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Jul;27(7):1013-1020.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.03.040. Epub 2016 May 26. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27236211
-
Occupational dose constraints for the lens of the eye for interventional radiologists and interventional cardiologists in the UK.Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun;89(1062):20150551. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150551. Epub 2016 Mar 24. Br J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27009739 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges in Occupational Dosimetry for Interventional Radiologists.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Jun;44(6):866-870. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02725-w. Epub 2021 Jan 3. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33388873 Review.
-
Better safe than so ray: national survey of radiation protection amongst interventional radiology trainees in the United Kingdom.Br J Radiol. 2023 Sep;96(1149):20230071. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20230071. Epub 2023 Jul 26. Br J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37493155 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous