Commercially Available Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Factors Contributing to Favorable Outcomes With Ultrasound-Mediated Drug Delivery and Ultrasound Localization Microscopy Imaging
- PMID: 40262129
- DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001197
Commercially Available Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Factors Contributing to Favorable Outcomes With Ultrasound-Mediated Drug Delivery and Ultrasound Localization Microscopy Imaging
Abstract
Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are microbubbles comprising an inert gas core stabilized by an encapsulating shell, which serves to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of blood-to-tissue in diagnostic ultrasound imaging. More recently, research has investigated the use of UCAs to combine both diagnostics and therapeutic outcomes in an amalgamated approach, designated 'theranostics.' Two examples of theranostic based approaches include the use of super-resolution imaging with ultrasound localized microscopy (ULM) and ultrasound-mediated drug delivery (UMDD). Both ULM and UMDD have been shown to have the potential to improve both patient care and clinical outcomes. Currently, there are 4 commercially available global UCAs licensed for clinical use. The physico-chemical properties of each of these UCAs influence its potential theranostic efficacy. Because of differences in their composition and/or manufacturing processes, each UCA has different characteristics that contribute to different in vivo resonance behavior, which in turn influences their effective clinical applications. This review highlights the key physico-chemical characteristic differences of the 4 commercially available contrast agents, with specific emphasis on their gaseous core, shell composition, and microbubble volume distribution, while providing novel insights into their benefits for supporting emerging clinical technologies, specifically ULM and UMDD.
Keywords: microbubble; super-resolution imaging; theranostics; ultrasound contrast agent; ultrasound mediated drug delivery.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: 4 of 5 authors (J.J.H., S.L.A., D.M.T., A.J.S.) are current employees of GE HealthCare; the manufacturer of Sonazoid and Optison. One author (F.J.M.T.) has been a prior employee of GE HealthCare and Bracco Imaging.
Similar articles
-
Synthesis of laboratory Ultrasound Contrast Agents.Molecules. 2013 Oct 21;18(10):13078-95. doi: 10.3390/molecules181013078. Molecules. 2013. PMID: 24152677 Free PMC article.
-
Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation.IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2017 Mar;64(3):555-567. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342. Epub 2016 Dec 15. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2017. PMID: 28113312
-
Super-resolution ultrasound localization microscopy based on a high frame-rate clinical ultrasound scanner: an in-human feasibility study.Phys Med Biol. 2021 Apr 8;66(8):10.1088/1361-6560/abef45. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abef45. Phys Med Biol. 2021. PMID: 33725687 Free PMC article.
-
Nano-sized Ultrasound Contrast Agents for Cancer Therapy and Theranostics.Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(35):5403-5412. doi: 10.2174/1381612823666170710120631. Curr Pharm Des. 2017. PMID: 28699518 Review.
-
A Review of Clinical Applications for Super-resolution Ultrasound Localization Microscopy.Curr Med Sci. 2022 Feb;42(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s11596-021-2459-2. Epub 2022 Feb 15. Curr Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 35167000 Review.
Cited by
-
Analyzing Molecular Determinants of Nanodrugs' Cytotoxic Effects.Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 11;26(14):6687. doi: 10.3390/ijms26146687. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. PMID: 40724938 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sirsi S, Borden M. Microbubble compositions, properties and biomedical applications. Bubble Sci Eng Technol. 2009;1(1–2):3–17.
-
- Frinking P, Segers T, Luan Y, et al. Three decades of ultrasound contrast agents: a review of the past, present and future improvements. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020;46:892–908.
-
- Wood SC, Antony S, Brown RP, et al. Effects of ultrasound and ultrasound contrast agent on vascular tissue. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2012;10:29.
-
- Frinking PJ, Bouakaz A, Kirkhorn J, et al. Ultrasound contrast imaging: current and new potential methods. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26:965–975.
-
- Rafter P, Phillips P, Vannan MA. Imaging technologies and techniques. Cardiol Clin. 2004;22:181–197.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources