Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 1;57(9):1829-1837.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003733. Epub 2025 Apr 23.

Reconsidering Exercise Selection with EMG: Poor Agreement between Ranking Hip Exercises with Gluteal EMG and Muscle Force

Tyler J Collings, Matthew N Bourne, Rod S Barrett, Evy Meinders, Basílio Gonçalves, Anthony J Shield, Laura E Diamond

Reconsidering Exercise Selection with EMG: Poor Agreement between Ranking Hip Exercises with Gluteal EMG and Muscle Force

Tyler J Collings et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. .

Abstract

Purpose: Electromyography (EMG) is commonly used to inform exercise selection for injury prevention and rehabilitation. However, mechanical tension is more important for driving adaptation than muscle activation alone. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of ranking hip-focused exercises based on the magnitude of gluteal surface EMG compared with estimates of muscle forces and the implications for exercise selection.

Methods: Fourteen healthy female footballers (18-30 yr old) performed eight hip-focused exercises using body weight and 12-repetition maximum loads. Full-body kinematics, ground reaction forces, and surface EMG from 12 lower limb muscles were recorded and used as inputs to a neuromusculoskeletal model to estimate gluteal muscle forces. Normalized EMG and normalized muscle force rankings were compared using Spearman's correlations, and the linear relationship between normalized EMG and muscle force was compared using linear mixed effects models.

Results: There was a weak relationship between exercise rankings based on EMG and muscle forces (Spearman's ρ = 0.29-0.51). Peak EMG amplitude alone explained 5% of gluteus maximus peak muscle force ( R2 = 0.05) and 19% of gluteus medius peak muscle force ( R2 = 0.19). However, when accounting for exercise and participant sources of variation, peak EMG amplitude explained 80%-85% of gluteus maximus and medius peak normalized muscle force.

Conclusions: Ranking gluteal resistance exercises by EMG amplitude resulted in a different order to ranking exercises by estimated muscle forces. For exercise selection, EMG may only be useful when comparing within an individual and between biomechanically similar exercises. Caution is warranted when basing exercise selection on gluteal EMG amplitude alone.

Keywords: ACTIVATION; MODELING; NEUROMUSCULOSKELETAL; PREVENTION; REHABILITATION.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ratamess NA, Alvar BA, Evetoch TE, et al. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2009;41(3):687–708.
    1. Barbalho M, Souza D, Coswig V, Abrahin O, Paoli A, Gentil P. The effects of resistance exercise selection on muscle size and strength in trained women. Int J Sports Med . 2021;42(4):371–6.
    1. Harøy J, Clarsen B, Wiger EG, et al. The adductor strengthening programme prevents groin problems among male football players: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med . 2019;53(3):145–52.
    1. Garrison JC, Bothwell J, Cohen K, Conway J. Effects of hip strengthening on early outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int J Sports Phys Ther . 2014;9(2):157–67.
    1. Moore D, Semciw AI, McClelland J, Wajswelner H, Pizzari T. Rehabilitation exercises for the gluteus minimus muscle segments: an electromyography study. J Sport Rehabil . 2019;28(6):544–51.