Decision-making Tools for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 40264907
- PMCID: PMC12011573
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006710
Decision-making Tools for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Background: Breast reconstruction is an essential consideration for patients with breast cancer undergoing a mastectomy. Patients commonly report inadequate education as an important cause of dissatisfaction with breast reconstructive care. Information sources for breast reconstruction vary in quality, accuracy, and validity. We sought to determine what academic and nonacademic resources exist supporting decision-making for patients undergoing breast reconstruction.
Methods: A search was conducted of both academic literature and nonacademic social media sources. Three academic databases and 5 social media platforms were searched using keywords. Three independent reviewers performed the selection and data extraction of sources that met the inclusion criteria.
Results: A total of 1172 academic articles and 1419 nonacademic records were screened, with 14 and 9 included for final review, respectively. Of the 5 nonacademic mediums searched, none were included from TikTok and Instagram. One decision-making tool (DMT) was included from Twitter, 4 from YouTube, and 4 from Google. Overall, the quality of available DMTs was very good. The one included academic DMT had a mean DISCERN score of 5, whereas the 4 DMTs from Google and Twitter had a median DISCERN score of 4. YouTube videos were ranked using the modified DISCERN tool with a median score of 5.
Conclusions: Accessibility was found to be a significant barrier for patients in academic and nonacademic platforms with significant knowledge required to effectively search these platforms for resources. Efforts must be made to improve accessibility and awareness of these DMTs, as such tools are essential in shared decision-making.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Breast Reconstruction with Fat Grafting Content on TikTok.Arch Plast Surg. 2022 Sep 23;49(5):614-616. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756296. eCollection 2022 Sep. Arch Plast Surg. 2022. PMID: 36159384 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Readability of Patient Education Materials on Breast Reconstruction by Major US Academic Hospitals as Compared With Nonacademic Sites.Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Jun 1;86(6):610-614. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002575. Ann Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 33234883
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
A Scoping Review of Personalized, Interactive, Web-Based Clinical Decision Tools Available for Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening in the United States.MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Mar 17;9(1):23814683241236511. doi: 10.1177/23814683241236511. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun. MDM Policy Pract. 2024. PMID: 38500600 Free PMC article.
-
Sports Medicine Surgeons Use Social Media to Network With Other Surgeons and Increase Patient Engagement: A Scoping Review.Arthroscopy. 2025 Jan 31:S0749-8063(25)00043-X. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.025. Online ahead of print. Arthroscopy. 2025. PMID: 39892425 Review.
References
-
- Lee S. Breast cancer statistics. Canadian Cancer Society. May 2022. Available at https://cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-types/breast/statistics. Accessed May 8, 2023.
-
- National Cancer Institute. Breast cancer treatment (PDQ®)—Health professional version. National Cancer Institute. December 5, 2023. Available at https://www.cancer.gov/types/breast/hp/breast-treatment-pdq. Accessed May 29, 2023.
-
- Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, et al. . Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1422–1429. - PubMed
-
- Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1938–1943. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous