Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 4;13(3):267.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines13030267.

Efficacy of Bacille Calmette-Guérin Against COVID-19 Hospitalisation: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomised Control Trials

Affiliations
Review

Efficacy of Bacille Calmette-Guérin Against COVID-19 Hospitalisation: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomised Control Trials

Joseph Inauen et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The BCG vaccine has long been hypothesised to have non-specific protective effects, and early epidemiological studies on COVID-19 suggested a possible protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the effect of the BCG vaccine on preventing severe COVID-19 disease, based on the rate of hospitalisation for COVID-19 related disease.

Methods: We performed a literature search of randomised control trials comparing BCG vaccine to placebo in adult participants using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. A random effects model was used to generate summary estimates. Risk of bias was assessed regarding randomisation, allocation sequence concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other biases.

Results: We included 11 studies involving 18,412 participants, reporting COVID-19 incidence. The hospitalisation rate was sought from the authors of papers that did not report on this statistic. There was no significant reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalisation across all studies (relative risk 0.85, 0.51-1.40, p = 0.335), COVID-19 incidence across all studies (relative risk 1.07, 0.94-1.21, p = 0.264), deaths reported in six studies (relative risk 0.67, 0.36-1.26, p = 0.733), and COVID-19-related critical care admissions reported in four studies (relative risk 0.43, 0.13-1.46, p = 0.746).

Conclusions: The findings from this meta-analysis, involving a large number of participants, suggest no protective effect of BCG vaccination against severe COVID-19 outcomes or overall SARS-CoV-2 incidence. Further research may be needed to explore the potential non-specific effects of BCG vaccination in other specific populations and against other infections.

Keywords: BCG; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; meta-analysis; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the literature search and included studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Primary outcome—forest plot of COVID-19-related hospital admissions. Blossey 2023 [26], Koekenbier 2023 [27], Madsen 2024 [31], Moorlag 2022 [28], Pittet 2023 [32], Ramos-Martinez 2021 [33], Santos 2023 [34], Sinha 2022 [30], TenDoesschate 2022 [35], Tsilika 2022 [29], Upton 2022 [36].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Secondary outcomes—forest plots: (a) COVID-19 incidence; (b) COVID-19-related critical care admissions; (c) COVID-19 deaths. Forest plots depicting the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for secondary outcomes. The random-effects model was used for analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the I2 statistic. Blossey 2023 [26], Koekenbier 2023 [27]Madsen 2024 [31], Moorlag 2022 [28], Pittet 2023 [32], Ramos-Martinez 2021 [33], Santos 2023 [34], Sinha 2022 [30], TenDoesschate 2022 [35], Tsilika 2022 [29], Upton 2022 [36].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Secondary outcomes—forest plots: (a) COVID-19 incidence; (b) COVID-19-related critical care admissions; (c) COVID-19 deaths. Forest plots depicting the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for secondary outcomes. The random-effects model was used for analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the I2 statistic. Blossey 2023 [26], Koekenbier 2023 [27]Madsen 2024 [31], Moorlag 2022 [28], Pittet 2023 [32], Ramos-Martinez 2021 [33], Santos 2023 [34], Sinha 2022 [30], TenDoesschate 2022 [35], Tsilika 2022 [29], Upton 2022 [36].
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a): Funnel plot for COVID-19–related hospitalisations. A funnel plot assessing potential publication bias in studies reporting COVID-19–related hospitalisation. Symmetry suggests low risk of publication bias. (b): Eggers test for COVID-19–related hospitalisation. Egger’s regression test evaluating the presence of publication bias in studies reporting COVID-19-related hospitalisation. A p-value of 0.628 indicates low risk of bias.

References

    1. Netea M.G., van Crevel R. BCG-induced protection: Effects on innate immune memory. Semin. Immunol. 2014;26:512–517. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2014.09.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breiman R.F., Streatfield P.K., Phelan M., Shifa N., Rashid M., Yunus M. Effect of infant immunisation on childhood mortality in rural Bangladesh: Analysis of health and demographic surveillance data. Lancet. 2004;364:2204–2211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17593-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garly M.L., Martins C.L., Bale C., Baldé M.A., Hedegaard K.L., Gustafson P., Lisse I.M., Whittle H.C., Aaby P. BCG scar and positive tuberculin reaction associated with reduced child mortality in West Africa. A non-specific beneficial effect of BCG? Vaccine. 2003;21:2782–2790. doi: 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00181-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lehmann D., Vail J., Firth M.J., de Klerk N.H., Alpers M.P. Benefits of routine immunizations on childhood survival in Tari, Southern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2005;34:138–148. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moulton L.H., Rahmathullah L., Halsey N.A., Thulasiraj R.D., Katz J., Tielsch J.M. Evaluation of non-specific effects of infant immunizations on early infant mortality in a southern Indian population. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 2005;10:947–955. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01434.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources