Evaluation of the Peer-Supported E-Health Module Implemented for University Students to Develop Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors
- PMID: 40266248
- PMCID: PMC12210790
- DOI: 10.1111/phn.13563
Evaluation of the Peer-Supported E-Health Module Implemented for University Students to Develop Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the peer-supported e-health module implemented for university students to gain healthy lifestyle behaviors.
Design: The study was planned in a quasi-experimental research design. The study participants were 81 university students. The peer-supported e-health module was applied to all students in the sample. The "Introductory Information Form," "Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale II," and "Peer Mentoring Assessing Scale" were used as data collection instruments. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22.00. Descriptive statistics, percentage and frequency distributions, the one-way repeated measures ANOVA, and Wilks' Lambda test were used in the study.
Results: Of the students who participated in the study, 91.4% had not received training similar to the e-health module, and 82.7% had not received peer-supported training previously. The total scores of the Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale II were 127.06 ± 18.48 at the pre-test and 149.69 ± 20.85 at the post-test, and there was a significant difference between the scores (p < 0.001). The e-health module increased students' scores by 56.7% with a significant and greater effect (η2 = 0.567). The total score of the scale on assessing peer mentoring of the students after the module was 56.79 ± 10.45.
Conclusions: It was observed that the peer supported e-health module supported students' healthy lifestyle behaviors and was an effective module. To raise awareness about sustainable health approaches, it is recommended to increase similar training programs in which students are more involved in the process.
Keywords: e‐health; healthy lifestyle; nursing; peer support; university students.
© 2025 The Author(s). Public Health Nursing published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202. Online ahead of print. Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025. PMID: 40542530
-
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897. Med Teach. 2009. PMID: 19404891
-
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27545902 Free PMC article.
-
Sertindole for schizophrenia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005. PMID: 16034864 Free PMC article.
-
Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 31;3(3):CD008676. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008676.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28362061 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Amanvermez, Y. , Rahmadiana M., Karyotaki E., et al. 2023. “Stress Management Interventions for College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 30, no. 4: 423. 10.1111/cpsp.12342. - DOI
-
- Arkün‐Kocadere, S. 2020. “Blended Peer Mentoring From the Learners' Perspective: Recommendations for Practitioners.” In Electronic Mentoring in Educational Sciences, edited by Öngöz S., 175–188. 10.14527/9786257052801.09. - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical