Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul-Aug;42(4):1525-1533.
doi: 10.1111/phn.13563. Epub 2025 Apr 23.

Evaluation of the Peer-Supported E-Health Module Implemented for University Students to Develop Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Peer-Supported E-Health Module Implemented for University Students to Develop Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors

Ayla Hendekci et al. Public Health Nurs. 2025 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the peer-supported e-health module implemented for university students to gain healthy lifestyle behaviors.

Design: The study was planned in a quasi-experimental research design. The study participants were 81 university students. The peer-supported e-health module was applied to all students in the sample. The "Introductory Information Form," "Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale II," and "Peer Mentoring Assessing Scale" were used as data collection instruments. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22.00. Descriptive statistics, percentage and frequency distributions, the one-way repeated measures ANOVA, and Wilks' Lambda test were used in the study.

Results: Of the students who participated in the study, 91.4% had not received training similar to the e-health module, and 82.7% had not received peer-supported training previously. The total scores of the Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale II were 127.06 ± 18.48 at the pre-test and 149.69 ± 20.85 at the post-test, and there was a significant difference between the scores (p < 0.001). The e-health module increased students' scores by 56.7% with a significant and greater effect (η2 = 0.567). The total score of the scale on assessing peer mentoring of the students after the module was 56.79 ± 10.45.

Conclusions: It was observed that the peer supported e-health module supported students' healthy lifestyle behaviors and was an effective module. To raise awareness about sustainable health approaches, it is recommended to increase similar training programs in which students are more involved in the process.

Keywords: e‐health; healthy lifestyle; nursing; peer support; university students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Abu‐Moghli, F. A. , Khalaf I. A., and Barghoti F. F.. 2010. “The Influence of a Health Education Programme on Healthy Lifestyles and Practices Among University Students.” International Journal of Nursing Practice 16, no. 1: 35–42. 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2009.01801.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Açıkgöz Çepni, S. , and Kitiş Y.. 2017. “Relationship Between Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors and Health Locus of Control and Health‐Specific Self‐Efficacy in University Students.” Japan Journal of Nursing Science 14, no. 3: 231–239. 10.1111/jjns.12154. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alothman, S. A. , Al Baiz A. A., Alzaben A. S., Khan R., Alamri A. F., and Omer A. B.. 2024. “Factors Associated With Lifestyle Behaviors Among University Students—A Cross‐Sectional Study.” Healthcare 12, no. 2: 154. 10.3390/healthcare12020154. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanvermez, Y. , Rahmadiana M., Karyotaki E., et al. 2023. “Stress Management Interventions for College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 30, no. 4: 423. 10.1111/cpsp.12342. - DOI
    1. Arkün‐Kocadere, S. 2020. “Blended Peer Mentoring From the Learners' Perspective: Recommendations for Practitioners.” In Electronic Mentoring in Educational Sciences, edited by Öngöz S., 175–188. 10.14527/9786257052801.09. - DOI

Grants and funding