Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 23.
doi: 10.1007/s00213-025-06788-w. Online ahead of print.

Incremental efficacy systematic review and meta-analysis of psilocybin-for-depression RCTs

Affiliations
Review

Incremental efficacy systematic review and meta-analysis of psilocybin-for-depression RCTs

Nicholas C Borgogna et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl). .

Erratum in

Abstract

Rationale: Psilocybin is a potentially paradigm-shifting depression intervention. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of psilocybin-for-depression randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Objectives: Systematically assess harm reporting, risk of bias, action mechanism specification, and incremental therapeutic effect sizes in the psilocybin-for-depression RCT literature.

Methods: Assessed databases included PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus. Search terms "Psilocybin" or "Psychedelic" were paired with "Depression", and "Randomized Controlled Trial" or "RCT".

Results: We identified k = 9 RCTs (k = 10 subgroups) involving n = 602 participants (56% psilocybin). Five studies had low/very low harm quality reporting, opposed to two with high. Most studies demonstrated a high risk of bias. Therapeutic mechanisms of action (MoAs) were discussed in varying detail but rarely assessed in original publications. Psilocybin was moderately superior to controls at reducing depression (g = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.27, 0.98). Effects were heterogenous (τ = .47). Smaller studies evidenced stronger effects that favored psilocybin (Egger's b0 = 3.63, p = .014). Almost all studies documented financial conflicts of interests.

Conclusion: Psilocybin demonstrates significant depression reduction relative to controls. However, researchers, clinicians, and stakeholders should consider several contextual factors. Effects were moderate and attenuated in larger and better-controlled studies. Harms reporting and risk of bias was high, though partly driven by unique challenges of psilocybin research. MoAs were variably specified but rarely assessed; suggesting it is unclear how depression is reduced. We advise researchers conduct RCTs with active control conditions, larger samples, and include MoA assessments. Independent RCTs from researchers without financial conflicts of interest are needed.

Keywords: Depression; Effect Size; Harm Reporting; Mechanisms of Action; Psilocybin; Psychedelics; Randomized Controlled Trial; Risk of Bias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: This study did not involve living subjects and therefore was exempt from ethical board review Consent to participate: No consent to participate was administered as there were no living subjects. Consent to publication: All authors consent to publication. Competing interest: All authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association (2022) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5-TR. American Psychiatric Association - DOI
    1. Anderson T, Petranker R, Christopher A, Rosenbaum D, Weissman C, Dinh-Williams LA, Hui K, Hapke E (2019) Psychedelic microdosing benefits and challenges: An empirical codebook. Harm Reduct J 16:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12954-019-0308-4/FIGURES/3 - DOI
    1. Automeris LLC. (2024). Web Plot Digitizer. Automeris.Io. https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer.html
    1. Back AL, Freeman-Young TK, Morgan L, Sethi T, Baker KK, Myers S, McGregor BA, Harvey K, Tai M, Kollefrath A, Thomas BJ, Sorta D, Kaelen M, Kelmendi B, Gooley TA (2024) Psilocybin therapy for clinicians with symptoms of depression from frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open 7:e2449026. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2024.49026 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bech P (2010) Struggle for subtypes in primary and secondary depression and their mode-specific treatment or healing. Psychother Psychosom 79:331–338. https://doi.org/10.1159/000320118 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources