Long-term outcomes of metabolic bariatric surgery: a 10-Year multicenter retrospective study in Poland (BARI-10-POL)
- PMID: 40266387
- PMCID: PMC12018482
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-025-03713-9
Long-term outcomes of metabolic bariatric surgery: a 10-Year multicenter retrospective study in Poland (BARI-10-POL)
Abstract
Purpose: Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective treatment for obesity and obesity-related diseases, but long-term data on its outcomes remain limited, particularly in Poland. These data are crucial for understanding the durability of weight loss, trends in weight regain, and comorbidity remission, as well as for refining surgical techniques and improving long-term care. This study aims to evaluate the 10-year outcomes of MBS in Poland, focusing on weight loss and remission of obesity-related diseases in patients who completed follow-up.
Materials and methods: This multicenter retrospective study, named BARI-10-POL, analyzed 485 patients (mean age: 41.0 years, 71.5% female, median BMI: 43.4 kg/m²) who underwent laparoscopic MBS between 2008 and 2014 across five bariatric centers. Data collected included demographics, type of surgery, weight loss (%TWL, %EWL), and remission of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension (HT).
Results: The follow-up rate was 28.5% (485/1703). Among the procedures, 317 (65.4%) were sleeve gastrectomies (SG). The median %EWL and %TWL were 59.2% and 22.8%, respectively. Revisional procedures were required in 23.9% of patients, most commonly after SG (24.3%) and adjustable gastric banding (100%). The remission rates for T2D and HT were 70.8% and 56.7%, respectively. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) demonstrated superior median %EWL (80.1%) compared to SG (55.0%, p < 0.001) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (51.4%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Conducting long-term follow-up after bariatric surgery is challenging. MBS leads to significant long-term outcomes in both weight loss and remission of obesity-related diseases.
Keywords: 10-years follow-up; Bariatric surgery; Long-term follow-up; Weight loss.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from the participant included in the study.
References
-
- Luca P, Nicolas C, Marina V, Sarah B, Andrea L (2021) Where are my patients?? Lost and found in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 31:1979–1985 - PubMed
-
- Arterburn DE, Telem DA, Kushner RF, Courcoulas AP (2020) Benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in adults: A review. JAMA 324(9):879–887. 10.1001/jama.2020.12567 - PubMed
-
- Lee JH, Nguyen QN, Le QA (2016) Comparative effectiveness of 3 bariatric surgery procedures: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(5):997–1002 - PubMed
-
- Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E, Aminian A, Angrisani L American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg. 2023;33(1):3–14. 10.1007/s11695-022-06332-1. Erratum in: Obes Surg. 2023;33(1):15–16. doi:, Karlsson J, Taft C, Ryden A et al (2022) Ten-year trends in health-related quality of life after surgical and conventional treatment for severe obesity: the SOS intervention study. Int J Obes. 2007;31:1248–1261. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803573 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
