Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 1;12(3):206.
doi: 10.3390/vetsci12030206.

Populational Model of Rhipicephalus microplus in Beef Cattle in the Southern Region of Paraná, Brazil

Affiliations

Populational Model of Rhipicephalus microplus in Beef Cattle in the Southern Region of Paraná, Brazil

Daniel Perotto et al. Vet Sci. .

Abstract

In order to describe the population dynamics of R. microplus in the southern region of the state of Paraná, Brazil, and to identify racial differences between hosts in the level of infestation by this parasite, the teleogins of approximately 70 males per year were counted every 14 days for 5 years. The herd comprised eight genetic groups, aged 12 to 24 months, in an area of 76 ha (60 ha of native fields and 16 ha of Hemarthria altíssima). The monthly averages of the counts per animal were analyzed using the GENMOD procedure, which accounts for the effects of genetic group, month, genetic group × month and cycle. Three generations of ticks of increasing infestation intensity were analyzed in December, February and May, respectively. Animals from Caracu and Canchim breeds as well as Charolais × Caracu and Aberdden Angus × Canchim cross-breeds had the lowest levels of infestation compared to Charolais and Aberdeen Angus. We conclude that by employing the aforementioned mixed breeds, in combination with a strategic control of initiating the application of acaricides in November, followed by two to three treatments every 21 days, this procedure represents the most effective method of controlling ticks in this region.

Keywords: animal welfare; health; parasitology; tick.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Log distribution of the count + 1 in beef cattle in Campos Gerais, Ponta Grossa, Paraná.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Count + 1 distribution in beef cattle in Campos Gerais, Ponta Grossa, Paraná.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Seasonal variation in tick counts in beef cattle in the southern region of Paraná.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Seasonal variation in tick counts in beef cattle for eight genetic groups: 1. Canchim; 2. Canchin × Aberdeen Angus; 3. Aberdeen Angus × Canchin; 4. Aberdeen Angus; 5. Charlais; 6. Charolais × Caracu; 7. Caracu × Charolais; 8. Caracu in the southern region of Paraná.

References

    1. Alves-Branco F., Sapper M., Pinheiro A.d.C., Alves-Branco L., Alves-Branco F.d.P.J., Cppsul A. Carrapato dos Bovinos (Boophilus microplus): Controle e Resistência a Carrapaticidas no Rio Grande do Sul. 2008. [(accessed on 22 December 2024)]. Available online: https://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/228549.
    1. Andreotti R., Garcia M., Paiva F. Ticks of Importance to One Health and Animal Production in Brazil. Embrapa Gado de Corte; Campo Grande, Brazil: 2022.
    1. Grisi L., Leite R.C., Martins J.R.d.S., Barros A.T.M.d., Andreotti R., Cançado P.H.D., León A.A.P.d., Pereira J.B., Villela H.S. Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2014;23:150–156. doi: 10.1590/S1984-29612014042. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maiorano A.M., Mota T.S., Verdugo A.C., da Silva Faria R.A., da Silva B.P.M., de Sena Oliveira M.C., Cyrillo J.N.d.S.G., de Vasconcelos Silva J.A.I. Comparative study of cattle tick resistance using generalized linear mixed models. Braz. J. Biom. 2019;37:41–55. doi: 10.28951/rbb.v37i1.341. - DOI
    1. Silva R.P.B., Pacheco L.R., Lima T.S., Oliveira R.M., Souza M.S., de Jesus Barbosa C., Ribas J.R.L., Barbosa L.V. Diagnóstico parasitológico da tristeza parasitária bovina na bahia–estudo retrospectivo de 2017 a 2021. Res. Soc. Dev. 2022;11:e28511225584. doi: 10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25584. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources