Protein oxidation in non-exercising healthy adults under varying dietary conditions: Physiological determinants, effects on fuel partitioning, and implications for body weight regulation
- PMID: 40268049
- PMCID: PMC12170168
- DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2025.156270
Protein oxidation in non-exercising healthy adults under varying dietary conditions: Physiological determinants, effects on fuel partitioning, and implications for body weight regulation
Abstract
Background: Protein oxidation (PROTOX) typically accounts for the smallest fraction of daily energy expenditure (24hEE) in humans compared to carbohydrate and lipid oxidation. However, inter-individual differences in PROTOX may explain differences in fuel partitioning and body weight change. We aimed to elucidate the physiological determinants of PROTOX under controlled 24-h dietary conditions, including eucaloric feeding, fasting, and overfeeding diets with variable protein content.
Methods: Eighty-six weight-stable healthy volunteers with normal glucose regulation (67 M/19F; age: 37 ± 10 years; BMI: 26.7 ± 4.5 kg/m2, body fat by DXA: 29.0 ± 9.8 %) underwent 24hEE measurements by whole-room calorimetry during energy balance (20 % protein, 50 % carbohydrate), different overfeeding diets (200 % of the daily eucaloric requirement), including three normal-protein (20 %) diets (balanced: 50 % carbohydrate; high-carbohydrate: 75 % carbohydrate; high-fat: 60 % fat), low-protein (3 %) and high-protein (30 %), and 24-h fasting in a randomized crossover design. Urine samples were collected during each 24-h dietary intervention for quantification of PROTOX and catecholamine excretion rates by nitrogen excretion and high-performance liquid chromatography, respectively.
Results: PROTOX during energy balance (mean ± SD: 372 ± 78 kcal/day) was positively associated with protein intake (r = 0.39, p < 0.001), fat free mass (r = 0.35, p < 0.001), but not with fat mass (p = 0.24). Higher PROTOX was associated with higher 24-h urinary norepinephrine (partial r = 0.27, p = 0.01), but not epinephrine (p = 0.48), excretion rates. During normal-protein diets, higher PROTOX was associated with lower lipid oxidation, but showed no association with carbohydrate oxidation. Inter-individual variability in PROTOX did not predict changes in weight or body composition over two years.
Conclusion: Dietary protein content, lean body mass, and sympathetic nervous system activity are key determinants of PROTOX. Although PROTOX did not predict free-living weight gain, increased PROTOX is associated with decreased lipid oxidation, underscoring its role in fuel partitioning and whole-body energy and substrate balance.
Keywords: Energy expenditure; Epinephrine; Lipid oxidation; Norepinephrine; Protein leverage; Protein oxidation; Weight gain.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
-
- Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ. Protein Leverage: Theoretical Foundations and Ten Points of Clarification. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019;27:1225–38. - PubMed
-
- Martens EA, Lemmens SG, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Protein leverage affects energy intake of high-protein diets in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97:86–93. - PubMed
-
- Martens EA, Tan SY, Dunlop MV, Mattes RD, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Protein leverage effects of beef protein on energy intake in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99:1397–406. - PubMed
-
- Dorner R, Hagele FA, Koop J, Rising R, Foerster T, Olsen T, et al. Validation of energy expenditure and macronutrient oxidation measured by two new whole-room indirect calorimeters. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022;30:1796–805. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical