The relationship between safety measures, preparedness, and mental health outcomes in New York City during the COVID-19 pandemic
- PMID: 40270571
- PMCID: PMC12014668
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1547178
The relationship between safety measures, preparedness, and mental health outcomes in New York City during the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated strict safety measures and preparedness, potentially influencing mental well-being worldwide. This study investigated the impact of safety measures and preparedness levels on mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City, USA examining how sociodemographic characteristics modified these associations.
Method: A longitudinal study of 1,227 participants from three ongoing cohorts, provided data through telephone interviews across three waves from March 2020 to August 2021. Depression and anxiety were measured using Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7). Logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between safety measures, preparedness, and mental health outcomes over time, adjusting for potential confounders and assessing the modification effect of demographic factors.
Results: At Wave 1, 18% of participants reported moderate to severe depression, while 20% had moderate to severe anxiety. Over time, these rates declined significantly, with depression dropping to 9% and anxiety to 10% by Wave 3. Safety measures practiced at Wave 1 showed a protective effect on depression at Wave 3 (OR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.91). Higher preparedness levels were significantly associated with reduced odds of anxiety (aOR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.55, 0.93) in the concurrent wave. Age specific analysis revealed that individuals aged 26-35 experienced stronger protective effects from higher preparedness levels (OR=0.43, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.92) compared to younger age groups.
Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of safety measures and preparedness in mitigating mental health challenges during crises. Addressing age specific factors and preparedness levels can guide the public health strategies to better support diverse populations.
Keywords: COVID-19; New York City; anxiety; depression; pandemic responses; preparedness; safety measures; time trends.
Copyright © 2025 Vo, Skokauskas, Cheslack-Postava and Hoven.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Persistence of anxiety among Asian Americans: racial and ethnic heterogeneity in the longitudinal trends in mental well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Apr;59(4):599-609. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02553-6. Epub 2023 Aug 25. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 37624465
-
The impact of COVID-19 on subthreshold depressive symptoms: a longitudinal study.Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021 Feb 15;30:e20. doi: 10.1017/S2045796021000044. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021. PMID: 33583474 Free PMC article.
-
The Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety and Associated Factors among the General Public during COVID-19 Pandemic: a Cross-sectional Study in Korea.J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jul 26;36(29):e214. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e214. J Korean Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 34313037 Free PMC article.
-
eHealth literacy was associated with anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 22;11:1194908. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1194908. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37427252 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review of the Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Systems and Society-The Role of Diagnostics and Nutrition in Pandemic Response.J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 4;14(7):2482. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072482. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40217931 Free PMC article. Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources