Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 23;17(3):e81051.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.81051. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Use of Virtual Surgical Planning in Oral Surgery: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Use of Virtual Surgical Planning in Oral Surgery: A Systematic Review

Mohammad Abrar Bhatt et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Virtual surgical planning (VSP) represents a significant advancement in craniomaxillofacial surgery by utilizing 3D imaging and computer-aided techniques to enhance precision and improve surgical outcomes. This research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of VSP in comparison to traditional surgical planning methods. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of studies published between 2000 and 2024, sourced from MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. A total of 22 studies, including cohort, case-control, and randomized controlled trials, were analyzed to assess the impact of VSP on surgical accuracy, procedure duration, and patient outcomes. The findings revealed that VSP improves surgical accuracy and reduces operative times compared to conventional methods. However, challenges such as higher material costs and occasional inconsistencies in results remain. Despite these challenges, VSP holds significant potential to enhance precision and efficiency in oral surgery.

Keywords: 3d imaging; craniomaxillofacial surgery; surgical accuracy; systematic review; virtual surgical planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PRISMA Checklist
PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses
Figure 2
Figure 2. Summary plot
Figure 3
Figure 3. Traffic light plot

References

    1. Virtual surgical planning for mandibular reconstruction with the fibula free flap: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Barr ML, Haveles CS, Rezzadeh KS, et al. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84:117–122. - PubMed
    1. Considerations for virtual surgical planning and simulation in orthognathic surgery—a narrative review. Kwon TG, Lee ST, Choi SY, et al. Front Oral Maxillofac Med. 2020;2:27.
    1. Secondary mandible reconstruction with computer-assisted-surgical simulation and patient-specific pre-bent plates: the algorithm of virtual planning and limitations revisited. Bhandari K, Lin C-H, Liao H-T. Appl Sci. 2022;12:4672.
    1. Systematic review of the software used for virtual surgical planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery over the last decade. Tel A, Arboit L, De Martino M, et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;52(7):775–786. - PubMed
    1. A systematic review of intraoperative process mapping in surgery. Chung RD, Hunter-Smith DJ, Spychal RT, Ramakrishnan VV, Rozen WM. Gland Surg. 2017;6:715–725. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources