Assessment of Quality in Antimicrobial Calcium Phosphate Research (AQUACAP): A Systematic Review
- PMID: 40271750
- PMCID: PMC11990066
- DOI: 10.3390/ma18071543
Assessment of Quality in Antimicrobial Calcium Phosphate Research (AQUACAP): A Systematic Review
Abstract
The effectiveness of antimicrobial ion-substituted calcium phosphate biomaterials has been investigated in numerous studies, but reporting guidelines and quality checklists are missing. A novel quality checklist was created for assessing reporting and methodological quality by experts of relevant disciplines. The checklist consisted of 20 items for reporting quality (maximum score 32) and 11 for methodological quality (maximum score 18). The checklist was subsequently implemented to assess the reporting and methodological quality of 58 studies in this field. Possible associations between study quality, year of publication and citations were investigated, and items for improvement were identified. Main items for improvement in reporting quality (average score 18/32) were reporting variability and statistics of data, reporting rationales for study design and the clinical relevance of the outcomes. Methodological quality (average score 11/18) could be improved by including positive control groups, using clinically relevant material formulations and including tests of the material toxicity. No association was found between study quality and year of publication. Methodological quality was associated with a higher number of annual citations. This study identifies key areas for improvement of reporting and methodological quality in the field of ion-substituted antimicrobial calcium phosphates. With these findings, the quality of future studies on antimicrobial CaP materials can be improved. The new quality checklist can also be used to improve study design for future research and enables better comparison between study outcomes.
Keywords: checklist; coating; hydroxyapatite; infection; prosthetic joint.
Conflict of interest statement
This article was written in collaboration with CAM Bioceramics B.V., situated in Leiden, The Netherlands. CAM Bioceramics B.V. is a contract development and manufacturing organisation of Calcium Phosphates.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 May;51(3):308-316. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12462. Epub 2019 Feb 25. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019. PMID: 30806019
-
Authors arbitrarily used methodological approaches to analyze the quality of reporting in research reports: a meta-research study.J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;158:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.008. Epub 2023 Mar 11. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023. PMID: 36907252
-
Self-reporting with checklists in artificial intelligence research on medical imaging: a systematic review based on citations of CLAIM.Eur Radiol. 2024 Apr;34(4):2805-2815. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10243-9. Epub 2023 Sep 22. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 37740080
-
Evidence Based Social Science in China Paper 4 : The quality of social science systematic reviews and meta-analysis published from 2000-2019.J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;141:132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.031. Epub 2021 Oct 16. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 34662710 Review.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
References
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous