Communication and relationship satisfaction of Fly-in, Fly-out workers and partners
- PMID: 40273229
- PMCID: PMC12021284
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322337
Communication and relationship satisfaction of Fly-in, Fly-out workers and partners
Abstract
Fly-in fly-out (FIFO) work involves commuting long distances and living in provided accommodation for 1-4 weeks while on shift. Little is known about couple communication and relationship satisfaction of this population. Separate cohorts of FIFO workers and partners of FIFO workers completed daily surveys to self-report time spent communicating with their partner (in person, over the computer, and by phone) and relationship satisfaction for up to 7 days during on-shift and 7 days during off-shift periods (806 observations from N = 106 with 19 couples). For FIFO workers, but not partners of FIFO workers, relationship satisfaction was lower during on-shift days than off-shift days. This difference was completely mediated by time spent communicating with romantic partner, such that after accounting for the impact of lower time spent communicating on relationship satisfaction, there remained no significant difference in relationship satisfaction on-shift vs off-shift. Communication between FIFO workers and their romantic partners is essential to ensure the relationship does not suffer while the worker is away from home. FIFO organisations need to investigate ways to ensure quality communication between romantic partners can be maintained while the worker is on-site and partner spend long periods of time away from one another.
Copyright: © 2025 Forshaw et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Mental health and well-being concerns of fly-in fly-out workers and their partners in Australia: a qualitative study.BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 5;8(3):e019516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019516. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29519796 Free PMC article.
-
Health behaviours of Australian fly-in, fly-out workers and partners during on-shift and off-shift days: an ecological momentary assessment study.BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e023631. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023631. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30580269 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the Effects of FIFO/DIDO Workers Being Home versus Away on Sleep and Loneliness for Partners of Australian Mining Workers.Clocks Sleep. 2020 Mar 6;2(1):86-98. doi: 10.3390/clockssleep2010009. eCollection 2020 Mar. Clocks Sleep. 2020. PMID: 33089193 Free PMC article.
-
Australian fly-in, fly-out operations: Impacts on communities, safety, workers and their families.Work. 2016 Oct 17;55(2):413-427. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162412. Work. 2016. PMID: 27689595 Review.
-
Cyberintimacy: A Scoping Review of Technology-Mediated Romance in the Digital Age.Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 Oct;23(10):657-666. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0764. Epub 2020 Jul 24. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020. PMID: 32721219
References
-
- Birch E, Preston A. The Australian labour market in 2019. J Ind Relat. 2020;62(3):341–64.
-
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. Personal income in Australia, 2011-12 to 2017-18. Canberra: Australian Inst Health Wellbeing; 2021.
-
- Lifeline Western Australia. FIFO/DIDO mental health research report. 2013. Available from: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/42335551/fifo-dido-mental-health-....
-
- Misan GM, Rudnik E. The pros and cons of long-distance commuting: comments from South Australian mining and resource workers. J Econ Soc Policy. 2015;17(1):119–57.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical