Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;52(11):4281-4291.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07257-4. Epub 2025 Apr 25.

Tau profiling across Alzheimer's disease staging reveals vulnerability to disease pathophysiology

Affiliations

Tau profiling across Alzheimer's disease staging reveals vulnerability to disease pathophysiology

Gleb Bezgin et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Inter-individual variability in tau topography challenges the propagation hypothesis of tau aggregates.

Methods: To address this gap, we propose the Manifold Component Analysis (MCA), for identifying pseudo-continuous profiles informed by the spatial continuity of stage regions.

Results: Longitudinal and cross-sectional MCA in large aging cohort identified individual profiles (N = 753) expressing tau load in the entorhinal, limbic and neocortical regions. Using these profiles, we found neuropsychological and blood-based milestones of early and late disease stages. Finally, we also found evidence of rapid tau load increases and cognitive decline centered at the early-to-mid neocortical stages of Alzheimer's disease.

Conclusions: Stage system based on tau load and spreading profiles across cortical areas provide a compelling framework for inferring pathophysiological prognosis in Alzheimer's disease.

Keywords: 18F-MK6240 PET; Alzheimer’s disease; Component analysis; Dimensionality reduction; Neurofibrillary tangles; PET braak staging; Propagation; Tau.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The TRIAD cohort study was conducted in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Douglas Mental Health University Institute Research Ethics Board, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: HZ has served at scientific advisory boards and/or as a consultant for Abbvie, Alector, Annexon, Artery Therapeutics, AZTherapies, CogRx, Denali, Eisai, Nervgen, Novo Nordisk, Pinteon Therapeutics, Red Abbey Labs, Passage Bio, Roche, Samumed, Siemens Healthineers, Triplet Therapeutics, and Wave, has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Cellectricon, Fujirebio, Alzecure, Biogen, and Roche, and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program (outside submitted work). KB has served as a consultant, at advisory boards, or at data monitoring committees for Abcam, Axon, BioArctic, Biogen, JOMDD/Shimadzu. Julius Clinical, Lilly, MagQu, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Pharmatrophix, Prothena, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens Healthineers, and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program, outside the work presented in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Surface PET Braak masks used as input and output for MCA. Left: MCA discrete mask input, in lateral (top) and medial (bottom) views. Right: a pseudo-continuous representation of the discrete mask shown in the left, following MCA. Centre: colormaps corresponding to both discrete and continuous representations
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
MCA reveals hierarchical tau accumulation. MCA-derived PET Braak region profiles are shown segregated by the corresponding PET Braak stages, following cohort-derived thresholds based on established criteria (2.5 SD above young subjects’ respective PET Braak region values). Insets in the top are showing cortical distributions of tau that are below the threshold (cyan), above the threshold (magenta), and the current area of sampling (yellow)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
MCA Profiles of TRIAD tau-PET data, stratified by diagnosis and other criteria. A: all subjects’ 18F-MK-6240 data profiles stratified by APOE considering the presence of at least one formula image2 (blue), two formula image3 (green) and at least one formula image4 (red) alleles; B: profiles stratified by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores; C: by amyloid positivity defined by established threshold; D: by diagnosis represented by cognitively normal (CN), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) dementia subjects. Shaded lines indicate standard error across subjects within a given group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
MCA reveals rapid progression of tau during Braak stages 4 and 5. A: group-wise profiles per Braak stage for baseline (blue) and latest follow-up (red). B: percent change between baseline and latest follow-up across the entire MCA-derived PET Braak region continuum, for each Braak stage subjects’ group displayed on the left. Polynomial fits of 4th degree are displayed as dotted black lines for each Braak stage group’s follow-up– baseline difference
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Cognitive decline rapidly accelerates during stages 4 and 5. Absolute values of partial correlations between the MCA-derived PET Braak regions’ continua and neuropsychological assessment measurements are shown. The correlational fingerprints are sorted by the highest values of fitted 4th degree polynomial curves which are shown as dotted black lines, wherein the second column continues the first
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Neuroinflammation and hyperphosphorylation accelerate during stages 3, 4 and 5. Partial correlations between the MCA-derived PET Braak regions’ continua and several plasma biomarkers are shown. A: correlations between the MCA-derived PET Braak regions’ continua and GFAP, p-tau181 and p-tau231, respectively, using the corresponding ranges indicated by squiggly brackets; B: scatterplots and regression lines showing the respective correlations, segregated into the main diagnostic groups– CN, MCI and AD dementia
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Disease landmarks estimated using MCA. The curves represent 4th degree polynomials akin to those used in the previous figures

References

    1. Markson LE, Nash DB, Louis DZ, Gonnella JS. Clinical outcomes management and disease staging. Eval Health Prof. 1991;14(2):201–27. - PubMed
    1. Therriault J, Zimmer ER, Benedet AL, Pascoal TA, Gauthier S, Rosa-Neto P. Staging of Alzheimer’s disease: past, present, and future perspectives. Trends Mol Med. 2022;28(9):726–41. - PubMed
    1. Pascoal TA, Shin M, Kang MS, Chamoun M, Chartrand D, Mathotaarachchi S, et al. In vivo quantification of neurofibrillary tangles with [(18)F]MK-6240. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018;10(1):74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krumnack A, Reid AT, Wanke E, Bezgin G, Kotter R. Criteria for optimizing cortical hierarchies with continuous ranges. Front Neuroinform. 2010;4:7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239–59. - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources