Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;85(11):989-999.
doi: 10.1002/pros.24906. Epub 2025 Apr 24.

Impact of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Charly Bâcle  1 , Emilien Seizilles De Mazancourt  2 , Nadia Abid  2 , Alain Ruffion  3 , Olivier Rouvière  4 , Marc Colombel  2 , Hakim Fassi-Fehri  2
Affiliations

Impact of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Charly Bâcle et al. Prostate. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Active surveillance (AS) is a recommended strategy for low- or favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancers (PCa), avoiding more invasive treatments. However, the concurrent development of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) may necessitate holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). This study aims to evaluate the impact of HoLEP on patients under AS for PCa.

Methods: Medical records of patients under AS for PCa diagnosed between 2010 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a life expectancy of more than 10 years and a follow-up of at least 1 year were included. Functional and oncological outcomes, as well as follow-up data (PSA levels, PSA density (PSA-D), mpMRI, prostate biopsies), were collected. Patients who underwent HoLEP were compared to those who did not. The primary endpoint was discontinuation of AS.

Results: A total of 310 patients under AS were included, of whom 62 (20%) underwent HoLEP. Prostate volume was higher in the HoLEP group than in the non-operated group (70 vs. 50 g, p < 0.0001), and PSA density was lower (0.09 vs. 0.12 p < 0.0001). The median enucleated volume was 62 mL (IQR 34-85). Grade group (GG) 1 and 2 prostate cancer was identified in enucleated pathology in 17 (27%) and 3 (5%) patients, respectively. No patient had a GG lesion ≥ 3 on the enucleated pathology. The rate of AS discontinuation was 18% in the HoLEP group vs. 56% in the control group (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified HoLEP as a protective factor for continued AS (HR = 0.231; p < 0.0001). At last follow-up, PSA and PSA density were significantly lower in the HoLEP group (2 vs. 7.7 p < 0.0001 and 0.06 vs. 0.14 p < 0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion: Performing HoLEP in patients under AS for PCa with LUTS due to BPH may reduce the risk of deferred prostate cancer treatment, without altering oncological outcomes or future treatment options. HoLEP significantly impacts AS parameters, modifying patient monitoring. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and establish appropriate follow-up protocols.

Trial registration: CNIL number 24-5016.

Keywords: active surveillance; benign prostatic hyperplasia; holmium laser enucleation of the prostate; prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. G. Robert, A. De La Taille, and A. Descazeaud, “Données Épidémiologiques En Rapport Avec La Prise En Charge De L'hbp,” Progrès en Urologie 28, no. 15 (November 2018): 803–812, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2018.08.005.
    1. B. Lukacs, J. N. Cornu, M. Aout, et al., “Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Related to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Real‐Life Practice in France: A Comprehensive Population Study,” European Urology 64, no. 3 (September 2013): 493–501.
    1. B. M. Launer, K. T. McVary, W. A. Ricke, and G. L. Lloyd, “The Rising Worldwide Impact of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia,” BJU International 127, no. 6 (Juin 2021): 722–728.
    1. D. D. Jiang, J. Schenk, and N. Chakiryan, et al. “Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients With Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance,” supplement, Journal of Urology 206, no. S3 (September 2021).
    1. E. Schaeffer, S. Srinivas, E. S. Antonarakis, et al. “National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines Version 2.2022,” Prostate Cancer (NCCN, 2021).

MeSH terms

Substances