Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 25;10(4):200.
doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10040200.

Development and Evaluation of a Novel Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Device Integrating Piano Playing for Enhanced Motor Recovery

Affiliations

Development and Evaluation of a Novel Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Device Integrating Piano Playing for Enhanced Motor Recovery

Xin Zhao et al. Biomimetics (Basel). .

Abstract

This study developed and evaluated a novel upper-limb rehabilitation device that integrates piano playing into task-oriented occupational therapy, addressing the limitations of traditional continuous passive motion (CPM) training in patient engagement and functional recovery. The system features a bi-axial sliding platform for precise 61-key positioning and a ten-link, four-loop robotic hand for key striking. A hierarchical control framework incorporates MIDI-based task mapping, finger optimization using an improved Hungarian algorithm, and impedance-admittance hybrid control for adaptive force-position modulation. An 8-week randomized controlled trial demonstrated that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group, with a 74.7% increase in Fugl-Meyer scores (50.5 ± 2.5), a 14.6-point improvement in the box and block test (BBT), a 20.2-s reduction in nine-hole peg test (NHPT) time, and a 72.6% increase in rehabilitation motivation scale (RMS) scores (55.4 ± 3.8). The results indicate that combining piano playing with robotic rehabilitation enhances neuroplasticity and engagement, significantly improving motor function, daily activity performance, and rehabilitation adherence. This mechanical-control synergy introduces a new paradigm for music-interactive rehabilitation, with potential applications in home-based remote therapy and multimodal treatment integration.

Keywords: music-interactive rehabilitation; task-oriented occupational therapy; upper-limb rehabilitation device.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The specific structure of the novel upper-limb rehabilitation device.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structure of the translation mechanism: (a) horizontal translation; (b) vertical translation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Transmission mechanism and kinematic analysis model of the hand rehabilitation robot: (a) transmission mechanism of the hand rehabilitation robot; (b) Lagrangian coordinate system of the transmission mechanism.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Four loops of the transmission mechanism for the hand rehabilitation robot: (a) Five-bar loop L1, (b) Five-bar loop L2, (c) Four-bar loop L3, and (d) Four-bar loop L4.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Analysis and solutions for the lifting problem of the push rod motor: (a) Analysis of the motor lifting problem; (b) Three-dimensional design drawing of the slider structure.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The specific structure of the newly designed upper-limb rehabilitation occupational therapy device integrated with piano playing.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Hierarchical control flow chart.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The specific settings for the hand rehabilitation training of the patients in the experimental group: (a) The hand state when striking the piano keys; (b) The hand state when switching between striking the white and black keys.
Figure 9
Figure 9
The rehabilitation evaluation data of the experimental group and the control group: (a) Comparison of upper-limb motor function; (b) Comparison of finger flexibility; (c) Comparison of fine finger movement control ability; (d) Comparison of patients’ subjective experience.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gittler M., Davis A.M. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery. JAMA. 2018;319:820–821. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.22036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hayward K.S., Kramer S.F., Dalton E.J., Hughes G.R., Brodtmann A., Churilov L., Cloud G., Corbett D., Jolliffe L., Kaffenberger T., et al. Timing and Dose of Upper Limb Motor Intervention After Stroke: A Systematic Review. Stroke. 2021;52:3706–3717. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034348. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lim D.Y.-L., Lai H.-S., Yeow R.C.-H. A Bidirectional Fabric-Based Soft Robotic Glove for Hand Function Assistance in Patients with Chronic Stroke. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 2023;20:120. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01250-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh N., Saini M., Kumar N., Srivastava M.V.P., Mehndiratta A. Evidence of Neuroplasticity with Robotic Hand Exoskeleton for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 2021;18:76. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00867-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fujioka T., Hunt A.M. Mechanisms of Music Therapy and Music-Based Interventions. In: Devlin K., Kang K., Pantelyat A., editors. Music Therapy and Music-Based Interventions in Neurology: Perspectives on Research and Practice. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2023. pp. 9–21.

LinkOut - more resources