Canadian Expert Consensus Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Glioblastoma: Results of a Delphi Study
- PMID: 40277764
- PMCID: PMC12026134
- DOI: 10.3390/curroncol32040207
Canadian Expert Consensus Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Glioblastoma: Results of a Delphi Study
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive malignant brain tumor in adults, with an increasing incidence and a poor prognosis. Current challenges in glioblastoma management include rapid tumor growth, limited treatment effectiveness, high recurrence rates, and a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Given the complexity of glioblastoma care and recent advancements in diagnostic and treatment modalities, updated guidelines are needed in Canada. This Delphi study aimed to develop Canadian consensus recommendations for the diagnosis, classification, and management of newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma. A multidisciplinary panel of 14 Canadian experts in glioblastoma care was convened, and a comprehensive literature review was conducted to synthesize evidence and formulate initial recommendations. Consensus was achieved through three Delphi rounds, in which panelists rated their agreement with recommendation statements on a five-point Likert scale. Statements with ≥75% agreement were accepted, and others were revised for re-voting. Final recommendations were formulated based on the consensus level, strength of evidence, clinical expertise, and consideration of the Canadian healthcare context. These recommendations aim to standardize glioblastoma diagnosis and classification across Canada, provide evidence-based guidance for optimal treatment selection, integrate novel therapies, and enhance the overall quality of care for glioblastoma patients.
Keywords: diagnosis; glioblastoma; immunotherapy; management; molecular markers; targeted therapy; tumor-treating fields.
Conflict of interest statement
Novocure provided honoraria to enable the authors, Warren P. Mason, Marshall W. Pitz, Rebecca A. Harrison, Mary V. MacNeil, James R. Perry, Mary Jane Lim-Fat, Frank K. H. van Landeghem, David Mathieu, Gelareh Zadeh, Sarah Lapointe, David Roberge, Derek S. Tsang, and Jacob Easaw, to meet and supported STA Healthcare Communications for logistical assistance with the Delphi process and medical writing for the manuscript. The funders played no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. In addition, the authors declare the following conflicts of interest: Warren P. Mason received grants, consulting fees, and honoraria for academic lectures from Novocure and Servier, as well as consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, and participated on advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Novocure, Ono Therapeutics, and Servier. Marshall W. Pitz received grants from Novartis and Varian, consulting fees from Servier, and honoraria for academic lectures from Novartis and Servier. Rebecca A. Harrison received consulting fees from Servier Canada, as well as honoraria for academic lectures from EMD Serono, Pfizer, and Servier Canada, and held a role at the Brain Tumor Foundation of Canada. Mary V. MacNeil has no additional conflicts of interest to declare. James R. Perry received consulting fees from Novocure, NuVox, and Servier, honoraria for academic lectures and support for attending meetings from Servier Canada, and stocks from Synaptive Medical; moreover, James R. Perry participated in advisory boards for Novocure and Servier and held a role at the Global Coalition for Adaptive Research, the Canadian Brain Tumor Consortium, and the Society for Neuro-oncology. Mary Jane Lim-Fat received honoraria for academic lectures from Novocure and Servier. Frank K. H. van Landeghem received payment for expert testimony from the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner and holds a role at the Canadian Association of Neuropathologists. David Mathieu received consulting fees from Medexus and Servier and stock options from EncephalX and MedScint. Gelareh Zadeh has no additional conflicts of interest to declare. Sarah Lapointe received consulting fees from Alexion, Bayer, and Novocure, as well as honoraria for academic lectures from Servier, and participated on advisory boards for Servier. David Roberge received grants from Precirix, honoraria for academic lectures from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Recordati, and Roche Canada, payment for expert testimony from CNESST, support for attending meetings from IntraOp Medical, and stocks from AFX Medical, Croton Healthcare, and Miso Chip; moreover, Roberge participated in an advisory board for Novocure and held a role at the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology and the Canadian Cancer Trials Group. Derek S. Tsang received grants from the National Cancer Institute and consulting fees and stock from Need (
Figures
References
-
- Walker E., Liu J., Davis F., Climans S., Yuan Y. Brain Tumour Registry of Canada (BTRC): Survival and Prevalence Report 2010–2017. Brain Tumour Registry of Canada (BTRC) A Surveillance Research Collaborative; 2022. [(accessed on 11 November 2024)]. Available online: https://braintumourregistry.ca/2022-survival-and-prevalence-report.
-
- Walker E., Zakaria D., Yuan Y., Yasmin F., Shaw A., Davis F. Brain Tumour Registry of Canada (BTRC): Incidence (2013–2017) and Mortality (2014–2018) Report. Brain Tumour Registry of Canada (BTRC) A Surveillance Research Collaborative; 2021. [(accessed on 11 November 2024)]. Available online: https://braintumourregistry.ca/incidence-report.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical