Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 8;32(4):215.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol32040215.

Current Limitations of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Vulvar Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Current Limitations of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Vulvar Cancer

Myriam Gracia et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Vulvar cancer is a rare gynecologic malignancy with increasing incidence. Lymph node status is the most critical prognostic factor, traditionally assessed through inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, a procedure associated with significant morbidity. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), in selected cases, has emerged as a less invasive alternative with favorable oncologic outcomes. Objective: This review summarizes current evidence on the indications, technique, safety, and oncologic outcomes of SLNB in vulvar cancer, with a focus on controversial scenarios such as recurrent and larger tumors. Methods: A narrative review of PubMed-indexed studies published in English over the last 35 years was conducted. Eligible studies included original research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and case-control studies. Results: SLNB is recommended for unifocal vulvar tumors < 4 cm with stromal invasion > 1 mm and clinically negative nodes. Landmark trials, including GROINSS-V-I and GOG-173, confirmed its accuracy and lower morbidity compared to lymphadenectomy. SLNB utilization has increased since its inclusion in guidelines, with a concurrent decline in lymphadenectomy rates. Combined detection techniques are mandatory, while indocyanine green (ICG) is an emerging option. Future studies should focus on refining patient selection criteria, improving detection techniques, and clarifying the implications of low-volume nodal disease to further optimize outcomes for patients with vulvar cancer. Conclusion: SLNB is a validated, minimally invasive staging approach in early-stage vulvar cancer. Further research is needed to refine its role in high-risk cases and optimize detection methods.

Keywords: inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy; recurrent vulvar cancer; sentinel lymph node biopsy; vulvar cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sentinel lymph node in vulvar cancer. ICG.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bray F., Laversanne M., Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A. Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2024;74:229–263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Judson P.L., Habermann E.B., Baxter N.N., Durham S.B., Virnig B.A. Trends in the Incidence of Invasive and In Situ Vulvar Carcinoma. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006;107:1018–1022. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000210268.57527.a1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olawaiye A.B., Cotler J., Cuello M.A., Bhatla N., Okamoto A., Wilailak S., Purandare C.N., Lindeque G., Berek J.S., Kehoe S. FIGO Staging for Carcinoma of the Vulva: 2021 Revision. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2021;155:43–47. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13880. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miljanović-Špika I., Madunić M.D., Topolovec Z., Kujadin Kenjereš D., Vidosavljević D. Prognostic Factors for Vulvar Cancer. Acta Clin. Croat. 2021;60:25–32. doi: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.04. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klapdor R., Wölber L., Hanker L., Schmalfeldt B., Canzler U., Fehm T., Luyten A., Hellriegel M., Kosse J., Heiss C., et al. Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastases in Vulvar Cancer: An Analysis of the AGO-CaRE-1 Multicenter Study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2019;154:565–570. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.013. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources